Abstract:The increasing use of algorithms in allocating resources and services in both private industry and public administration has sparked discussions about their consequences for inequality and fairness in contemporary societies. Previous research has shown that the use of automated decision-making (ADM) tools in high-stakes scenarios like the legal justice system might lead to adverse societal outcomes, such as systematic discrimination. Scholars have since proposed a variety of metrics to counteract and mitigate biases in ADM processes. While these metrics focus on technical fairness notions, they do not consider how members of the public, as most affected subjects by algorithmic decisions, perceive fairness in ADM. To shed light on subjective fairness perceptions of individuals, this study analyzes individuals' answers to open-ended fairness questions about hypothetical ADM scenarios that were embedded in the German Internet Panel (Wave 54, July 2021), a probability-based longitudinal online survey. Respondents evaluated the fairness of vignettes describing the use of ADM tools across different contexts. Subsequently, they explained their fairness evaluation providing a textual answer. Using qualitative content analysis, we inductively coded those answers ( N = 3697). Based on their individual understanding of fairness, respondents addressed a wide range of aspects related to fairness in ADM which is reflected in the 23 codes we identified. We subsumed those codes under four overarching themes: Human elements in decision-making , Shortcomings of the data , Social impact of AI , and Properties of AI . Our codes and themes provide a valuable resource for understanding which factors influence public fairness perceptions about ADM.

Dimensions of Diversity in Human Perceptions of Algorithmic Fairness

Human Perceptions of Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: A Case Study of Criminal Risk Prediction

Fairness perceptions of algorithmic decision-making: A systematic review of the empirical literature

Demographics and discussion influence views on algorithmic fairness

Factors Influencing Perceived Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making: Algorithm Outcomes, Development Procedures, and Individual Differences

Disentangling Fairness Perceptions in Algorithmic Decision-Making: the Effects of Explanations, Human Oversight, and Contestability

On the Long-term Impact of Algorithmic Decision Policies: Effort Unfairness and Feature Segregation through Social Learning

Understanding Relations Between Perception of Fairness and Trust in Algorithmic Decision Making

Perceived algorithmic fairness: An empirical study of transparency and anthropomorphism in algorithmic recruiting

Perception of fairness in algorithmic decisions: Future developers' perspective

"The Human Must Remain the Central Focus": Subjective Fairness Perceptions in Automated Decision-Making

How Do Fairness Definitions Fare? Examining Public Attitudes Towards Algorithmic Definitions of Fairness

Fairness in Algorithmic Recourse Through the Lens of Substantive Equality of Opportunity

Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: a Multidisciplinary Survey

Designing Equitable Algorithms

Towards Algorithmic Transparency: A Diversity Perspective.

Algorithmic Fairness: A Tolerance Perspective

Algorithmic Fairness and Structural Injustice: Insights from Feminist Political Philosophy

'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage'; Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions

Fairness Deconstructed: A Sociotechnical View of 'Fair' Algorithms in Criminal Justice

Fair and Unbiased Algorithmic Decision Making: Current State and Future Challenges