Abstract:With the development of digital technologies such as big data, artificial intelligence and machine learning, many organizations try to introduce AI algorithms into the decision-making process to avoid the subjective inherent biases. Although AI algorithms improve the scientificity of decision-making, they also raise the issue of fairness in the decision-making process. Considering that employees are the direct subject of HR decision-making, how employees view and evaluate the fairness of AI algorithmic decision-making process is very important. However, researches on the above questions are rather limited.Based on the procedural fairness theory, this study discusses the impact of different decision-making subjects (AI algorithms vs. supervisors) on employees’ perception of fairness in the HR decision-making process. Through two experiments, we find that: (1) The decision-making of AI algorithms makes employees have a lower perception of procedural fairness than that of supervisors. (2) Information transparency mediates the relationship between AI algorithmic decision-making and employees’ perception of procedural fairness. Employees believe that AI algorithmic decision-making has lower information transparency, which in turn produces a lower perception of procedural fairness. (3) Inclusive climate moderates the relationship between AI algorithmic decision-making and employees’ perception of procedural fairness. When employees perceive a high level of organizational inclusive climate, the effect of AI algorithmic decision-making on the perception of program fairness will be weakened.Overall, this study responds to the call for more research that bridges AI algorithmic decision-making and individual perception of procedural fairness by examining information transparency as a mediator and inclusive climate as a moderator in this relationship. The findings not only challenge the existing mainstream view that AI algorithmic decision-making does not exist a lower bias than human decision-making, but also offer useful advice to managers and provide implications for organizational HR decision-making practices in the digital and intelligent era.

Perceived algorithmic fairness: An empirical study of transparency and anthropomorphism in algorithmic recruiting

Understanding Relations Between Perception of Fairness and Trust in Algorithmic Decision Making

Perception of fairness in algorithmic decisions: Future developers' perspective

When the Automated Fire Backfires: the Adoption of Algorithm-based HR Decision-making Could Induce Consumer's Unfavorable Ethicality Inferences of the Company

Human Perceptions of Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: A Case Study of Criminal Risk Prediction

Factors Influencing Perceived Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making: Algorithm Outcomes, Development Procedures, and Individual Differences

Fairness perceptions of algorithmic decision-making: A systematic review of the empirical literature

Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: a Multidisciplinary Survey

Fairness as a Determinant of AI Adoption in Recruiting: An Fairness as a Determinant of AI Adoption in Recruiting: An Interview-based Study Interview-based Study

Algorithms in personnel selection, applicants' attributions about organizations' intents and organizational attractiveness: An experimental study

"The Human Must Remain the Central Focus": Subjective Fairness Perceptions in Automated Decision-Making

Dimensions of Diversity in Human Perceptions of Algorithmic Fairness

'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage'; Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions

Can AI Algorithmic Decision-making Improve Employees’ Perception of Procedural Fairness?

People Perceive Algorithmic Assessments as Less Fair and Trustworthy Than Identical Human Assessments

Disentangling Fairness Perceptions in Algorithmic Decision-Making: the Effects of Explanations, Human Oversight, and Contestability

Are algorithms always fair? The study on public preferences toward algorithmic decision‐making: A case study from the perspectives of decision scenarios and social roles

A Human-Centric Perspective on Fairness and Transparency in Algorithmic Decision-Making

User Perceptions of Algorithmic Decisions in the Personalized AI System:Perceptual Evaluation of Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Explainability

Michael is better than Mehmet: exploring the perils of algorithmic biases and selective adherence to advice from automated decision support systems in hiring

Procedural Justice in Algorithmic Fairness