Abstract:Recent advancements in machine learning and deep learning have brought algorithmic fairness into sharp focus, illuminating concerns over discriminatory decision making that negatively impacts certain individuals or groups. These concerns have manifested in legal, ethical, and societal challenges, including the erosion of trust in intelligent systems. In response, this survey delves into the existing literature on algorithmic fairness, specifically highlighting its multifaceted social consequences. We introduce a novel taxonomy based on 'tolerance', a term we define as the degree to which variations in fairness outcomes are acceptable, providing a structured approach to understanding the subtleties of fairness within algorithmic decisions. Our systematic review covers diverse industries, revealing critical insights into the balance between algorithmic decision making and social equity. By synthesizing these insights, we outline a series of emerging challenges and propose strategic directions for future research and policy making, with the goal of advancing the field towards more equitable algorithmic systems.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper aims to explore and solve the complex problems in algorithmic fairness, especially to understand and classify different levels of fairness requirements from the perspective of "tolerance". Specifically, the goals of the paper include: 1. **Propose a new algorithmic fairness framework**: - The paper introduces a new taxonomy based on "tolerance", dividing fairness issues into three levels: legal tolerance, ethical tolerance, and personal tolerance. This method provides a structured perspective for understanding fairness in algorithmic decision - making. 2. **Systematically review existing literature**: - The article conducts a comprehensive review of existing algorithmic fairness research, covering multiple industries and application scenarios, revealing the balance problem between algorithmic decision - making and social fairness. 3. **Identify and analyze multi - dimensional fairness challenges**: - It analyzes the three key dimensions of distributive fairness, interactional fairness, and procedural fairness, and explores their performance in different scenarios. 4. **Propose future research directions**: - Based on the deficiencies of existing research, it proposes future research directions and policy recommendations, in order to promote the development and application of more fair algorithmic systems. 5. **Address unfair phenomena in the real world**: - The article shows the actual impact of algorithmic unfairness in multiple fields such as medical care, finance, and recruitment through specific case studies, and discusses how to alleviate these problems through technical means and social policies. ### Formula presentation Some formulas involved in the article are mainly used to explain the bias quantification methods in algorithms. For example, a formula mentioned in gender - bias mitigation is used to quantify the stereotype strength in word embeddings: \[ S(w_1, w_2) = \begin{cases} \cos(s_1 - s_2, w_1 - w_2) & \text{if } \|w_1 - w_2\| \leq \delta \\ 0 & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} \] where \((s_1, s_2)\) is a seed - word pair (such as "she" and "he"), and \(\delta\) is the similarity threshold. ### Summary Through the above methods, the paper not only provides researchers with a brand - new perspective to understand and solve algorithmic fairness problems, but also provides practical guidance for policy - makers and technology developers to ensure that algorithmic systems can achieve higher fairness and transparency in various application scenarios.

Algorithmic Fairness: A Tolerance Perspective

What-is and How-to for Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey, Reflection, and Perspective

Survey on Fairness Notions and Related Tensions

15 Years of Algorithmic Fairness -- Scoping Review of Interdisciplinary Developments in the Field

Understanding Relations Between Perception of Fairness and Trust in Algorithmic Decision Making

Algorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions

Fairness perceptions of algorithmic decision-making: A systematic review of the empirical literature

Long-Term Fairness Inquiries and Pursuits in Machine Learning: A Survey of Notions, Methods, and Challenges

Algorithmic Fairness and Social Welfare

Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: a Multidisciplinary Survey

Fairness issues, current approaches, and challenges in machine learning models

Fairness for Unobserved Characteristics: Insights from Technological Impacts on Queer Communities

Putting Fairness Principles into Practice: Challenges, Metrics, and Improvements

Factors Influencing Perceived Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making: Algorithm Outcomes, Development Procedures, and Individual Differences

How Do Fairness Definitions Fare? Examining Public Attitudes Towards Algorithmic Definitions of Fairness

Fairness Testing: A Comprehensive Survey and Analysis of Trends

Fairness in Recommendation: A Survey

Fairness in Recommendation: Foundations, Methods and Applications

Algorithmic Fairness and Statistical Discrimination

Peer-induced Fairness: A Causal Approach for Algorithmic Fairness Auditing

An Introduction to Algorithmic Fairness