Abstract:This paper presents a scoping review of algorithmic fairness research over the past fifteen years, utilising a dataset sourced from Web of Science, HEIN Online, FAccT and AIES proceedings. All articles come from the computer science and legal field and focus on AI algorithms with potential discriminatory effects on population groups. Each article is annotated based on their discussed technology, demographic focus, application domain and geographical context. Our analysis reveals a growing trend towards specificity in addressed domains, approaches, and demographics, though a substantial portion of contributions remains generic. Specialised discussions often concentrate on gender- or race-based discrimination in classification tasks. Regarding the geographical context of research, the focus is overwhelming on North America and Europe (Global North Countries), with limited representation from other regions. This raises concerns about overlooking other types of AI applications, their adverse effects on different types of population groups, and the cultural considerations necessary for addressing these problems. With the help of some highlighted works, we advocate why a wider range of topics must be discussed and why domain-, technological, diverse geographical and demographic-specific approaches are needed. This paper also explores the interdisciplinary nature of algorithmic fairness research in law and computer science to gain insight into how researchers from these fields approach the topic independently or in collaboration. By examining this, we can better understand the unique contributions that both disciplines can bring.

Fairness in Algorithmic Recourse Through the Lens of Substantive Equality of Opportunity

Escaping the Impossibility of Fairness: From Formal to Substantive Algorithmic Fairness

Towards Substantive Conceptions of Algorithmic Fairness: Normative Guidance from Equal Opportunity Doctrines

A survey of algorithmic recourse: definitions, formulations, solutions, and prospects

Designing Equitable Algorithms

Affirmative Algorithms: The Legal Grounds for Fairness as Awareness

Human Perceptions of Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: A Case Study of Criminal Risk Prediction

Fairness Deconstructed: A Sociotechnical View of 'Fair' Algorithms in Criminal Justice

Fair Enough? A map of the current limitations of the requirements to have fair algorithms

Dimensions of Diversity in Human Perceptions of Algorithmic Fairness

Rethinking Fairness: An Interdisciplinary Survey of Critiques of Hegemonic ML Fairness Approaches

On the Long-term Impact of Algorithmic Decision Policies: Effort Unfairness and Feature Segregation through Social Learning

How Do Fairness Definitions Fare? Examining Public Attitudes Towards Algorithmic Definitions of Fairness

Fairness perceptions of algorithmic decision-making: A systematic review of the empirical literature

Systemic Fairness

Emergent Unfairness in Algorithmic Fairness-Accuracy Trade-Off Research

Algorithmic Fairness with Feedback

Algorithmic Fairness and Structural Injustice: Insights from Feminist Political Philosophy

15 Years of Algorithmic Fairness -- Scoping Review of Interdisciplinary Developments in the Field

Algorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions

Subjective fairness in algorithmic decision-support