Abstract:We study the subconvexity problem for $GL_{3}(R)$ $L$-functions in the t-aspect using integral representations by combining techniques employed by Michel-Venkatesh in their study of the corresponding problem for $GL_{2}$ with ideas from recent works of Munshi, Holowinsky-Nelson and Lin. Our main objective is to give - from the perspective of integral representations of $L$-functions and automorphic representation theory - a possible explanation of the origin of the "key identity" arising in the latter series of works.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the sub - convexity problem in the t - aspect of the L - function on GL_3(R). Specifically, the author hopes to explain the origin of the "key identity" that emerged in recent research from the perspectives of the integral representation of the L - function and the theory of automorphic representations.
### Core Problems of the Paper
1. **Sub - convexity Problem**: For the standard automorphic L - function on GL_3(R), obtain a sub - convex bound in the t - aspect (i.e., the imaginary part in the complex plane). A sub - convex bound means that as the parameter \( T \to \infty \), the growth rate of the L - function is slower than the convex bound.
2. **Origin of the Key Identity**: Explain the origin of the key identities discovered by Munshi, Holowinsky - Nelson, and Lin et al. when studying the sub - convexity problem of the GL_3(R) L - function. These identities play an important role in simplifying the proof and improving the exponent.
### Research Methods
- **Integral Representation Method**: Combining the work of Michel - Venkatesh on GL_2 and the latest results of Munshi, Holowinsky - Nelson, Lin et al., use the integral representation method to study the L - function on GL_3(R).
- **Selection of Whittaker Function**: By selecting a specific Whittaker function \( W_\phi \), make the local zeta integral \( Z(W_\phi, \frac{1}{2}+iT) \) have a good asymptotic behavior as \( T \to \infty \), thereby deriving the key identity.
### Main Results
- **Theorem 1**: Give upper bound estimates for the global zeta integral \( Z(\phi, \frac{1}{2}+iT) \) and the local zeta integral \( Z(W_\phi, \frac{1}{2}+iT) \):
\[
Z(\phi, \frac{1}{2}+iT)\ll T^{\frac{1}{4}-\frac{1}{36}+\varepsilon}
\]
\[
Z(W_\phi, \frac{1}{2}+iT)\asymp T^{-\frac{1}{2}}\quad\text{as}\quad T \to \infty
\]
- **Sub - convex Bound**: Using the above results, prove the sub - convex bound of the GL_3(R) L - function:
\[
L(\pi, \frac{1}{2}+iT)=\frac{Z(\phi, \frac{1}{2}+iT)}{Z(W_\phi, \frac{1}{2}+iT)}\ll T^{\frac{3}{4}-\frac{1}{36}+\varepsilon}\quad\text{as}\quad T \to \infty
\]
### Key Techniques
- **Geometric Approximate Functional Equation**: By truncating the global zeta integral and introducing a smooth function \( h(y) \), obtain the geometric approximate functional equation, thereby transforming the problem into an estimate of the period integral.
- **Derivation of the Key Identity**: Through the properties of the Whittaker function and integral transformation, derive a form equivalent to Lin's key identity and explain its origin.
### Conclusion
This paper not only solves the sub - convexity problem of the GL_3(R) L - function but also provides a new perspective for understanding the origin of the key identity. This is helpful for further studying more extensive sub - convexity problems and may provide new tools and methods for other related fields.