Abstract:BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Surgery for degenerative scoliosis (DS) is a complex procedure with high complication and revision rates. Based on the concept that pelvic incidence (PI) is a constant parameter, the global alignment and proportional (GAP) score was developed from sagittal alignment data collected in the Caucasian populations to predict mechanical complications. However, the PI varies among different ethnic groups, and the GAP score may not apply to Chinese populations. Thus, this study aims to assess the predictability of the GAP score for mechanical complications in the Chinese populations and develop an ethnicity -adjusted GAP score. PURPOSE: To test the predictability of the original GAP score in the Chinese population and develop a Chinese ethnicity -tailored GAP scoring system. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGS: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 560 asymptomatic healthy volunteers were enrolled to develop Chinese ethnicity -tailored GAP (C -GAP) score and a total of 114 DS patients were enrolled to test the predictability of original GAP score and C -GAP score. OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic information, sagittal spinopelvic parameters of healthy volunteers and DS patients were collected. Mechanical complications were recorded at a minimum of 2 -year follow-up after corrective surgery for DS patients. METHODS: A total of 560 asymptomatic healthy volunteers with a mean age of 61.9 +/- 14.1 years were enrolled to develop ethnicity -adjusted GAP score. Besides, 114 surgically trated DS patients (M/F=10/104) with a mean age of 60.7 +/- 7.1 years were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data and radiological parameters of both groups, including PI, lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and global tilt (GT) were collected. Ideal LL, SS, and GT were obtained by calculating their correlation with PI of healthy volunteers using linear regression analysis. Relative pelvic version (RPV), relative lumbar lordosis (RLL), lordosis distribution index (LDI), and relative spinopelvic alignment (RSA) were obtained using the ideal parameters, and the Chinese population adjusted GAP score (C -GAP) was developed based on these values. The predictability of original and C -GAP for mechanical failure was evaluated using clinical and radiological data of DS patients by evaluating the area under the curve (AUC) using receiver operating characteristic curve. This study was supported the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 82272545), ($ 8,000 - 10,000) and the Jiangsu Provincial Key Medical Center, and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M701677), Level B ($ 5,000 - 7,000). RESULTS: Ideal SS=0.53 pound PI+9 (p=.002), ideal LL=0.48 pound PI+22 (p=.023) and ideal GT=0.46 pound PI -9 (p=.011). were obtained by correlation analysis using sagittal parameters from those healthy volunteers, and RPV, RLL, RSA, and LDI were calculated accordingly. Then, the ethnicity -adjusted C -GAP score was developed by summing up the numeric value of calculated RPV, RLL, RSA, and LDI. The AUC was classified as "no or low discriminatory power"for the original GAP score in predicting mechanical complications (AUC=0.592, p=.078). Similarly, the original GAP score did not correlate with mechanical complications in DS patients. According to the C -GAP score, the sagittal parameters were proportional in 25 (21.9%) cases, moderately disproportional in 68 (59.6%), and severely disproportional in 21% (18.5%) cases. The incidence of mechanical complications was statistically different among proportioned and moderately disproportional and severely disproportional portions of the C -GAP score (p=.03). The predictability of the C -GAP score is high with an AUC=0.773 (p < .001). In addition, there is a linear correlation between mechanical complication rate and C -GAP score ( x =0.102, p=.02). CONCLUSION: The Ethnicity -adjusted C -GAP score system developed in the current study provided a more accurate and reliable for predicting the risk of mechanical complications after corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Which components of the global alignment proportionality score have the greatest impact on outcomes in adult spinal deformity corrective surgery?

Are Higher Global Alignment and Proportion Scores Associated With Increased Risks of Mechanical Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery? An External Validation

Which sagittal evaluation system can effectively predict mechanical complications in the treatment of elderly patients with adult degenerative scoliosis? Roussouly classification or Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score

Optimal Reconstruction of Sagittal Alignment According to Global Alignment And Proportion Score Can Reduce Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Lumbar Fusion

Characteristics of Spinal Morphology according to the Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score in a Diverse, Asymptomatic Cohort

Stronger association of objective physical metrics with baseline patient-reported outcome measures than preoperative standing sagittal parameters for adult spinal deformity patients

Comparison of Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score and SRS-Schwab ASD Classification in the Analysis of Surgical Outcomes for Adult Spinal Deformity

How Good Are Surgeons at Achieving Their Preoperative Goal Sagittal Alignment Following Adult Deformity Surgery?

The T4-L1-Hip Axis: Sagittal Spinal Realignment Targets in Long-Construct Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Early Impact

Predictors of pelvic tilt normalization: a multicenter study on the impact of regional and lower-extremity compensation on pelvic alignment after complex adult spinal deformity surgery

Prediction of mechanical complications after corrective surgeries in adult degenerative scoliosis: modification and validation of the global alignment and proportion (GAP) score

Development of Ethnicity-Adjusted Global Alignment and Proportion Score to Predict the Risk of Mechanical Complications Following Corrective Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity.

Adult spinal deformity surgical decision-making score. Part 2: development and validation of a scoring system to guide the selection of treatment modalities for patients above 40 years with adult spinal deformity

Which Is More Predictive Value for Mechanical Complications: Fixed Thoracolumbar Alignment (T1 Pelvic Angle) Versus Dynamic Global Balance Parameter (Odontoid-Hip Axis Angle)

The more the better? Integration of vertebral pelvic angles (VPA) PJK thresholds to existing alignment schemas for prevention of mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery

Should pelvic incidence influence realignment strategy? A detailed analysis in adult spinal deformity

Counseling Guidelines for Anticipated Postsurgical Improvements in Pain, Function, Mental Health, and Self-image for Different Types of Adult Spinal Deformity

371 The Impact of Thoracolumbar Inflection Point on Outcomes and Complications in Adult Spinal Deformity

Lumbar Lordosis Redistribution and Segmental Correction in Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD)

Assessing the predictive power of the GAP score on mechanical complications: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

Long term mechanical failure in well aligned adult spinal deformity patients