How Good Are Surgeons at Achieving Their Preoperative Goal Sagittal Alignment Following Adult Deformity Surgery?

Justin S. Smith,Elias Elias,Tolga Sursal,Breton Line,Virginie Lafage,Renaud Lafage,Eric Klineberg,Han Jo Kim,Peter Passias,Zeina Nasser,Jeffrey L. Gum,Robert Eastlack,Alan Daniels,Gregory Mundis,Richard Hostin,Themistocles S. Protopsaltis,Alex Soroceanu,David Kojo Hamilton,Michael P. Kelly,Stephen J. Lewis,Munish Gupta,Frank J Schwab,Douglas Burton,Christopher P. Ames,Lawrence G. Lenke,Christopher I. Shaffrey,Shay Bess,on behalf of International Spine Study Group
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231161304
2023-02-25
Global Spine Journal
Abstract:Global Spine Journal, Ahead of Print. Study DesignMulticenter, prospective cohortObjectivesMalalignment following adult spine deformity (ASD) surgery can impact outcomes and increase mechanical complications. We assess whether preoperative goals for sagittal alignment following ASD surgery are achieved.MethodsASD patients were prospectively enrolled based on 3 criteria: deformity severity (PI-LL ≥25°, TPA ≥30°, SVA ≥15 cm, TCobb≥70° or TLCobb≥50°), procedure complexity (≥12 levels fused, 3-CO or ACR) and/or age (>65 and ≥7 levels fused). The surgeon documented sagittal alignment goals prior to surgery. Goals were compared with achieved alignment on first follow-up standing radiographs.ResultsThe 266 enrolled patients had a mean age of 61.0 years (SD = 14.6) and 68% were women. Mean instrumented levels was 13.6 (SD = 3.8), and 23.2% had a 3-CO. Mean (SD) offsets (achieved-goal) were: SVA = −8.5 mm (45.6 mm), PI-LL = −4.6° (14.6°), TK = 7.2° (14.7°), reflecting tendencies to undercorrect SVA and PI-LL and increase TK. Goals were achieved for SVA, PI-LL, and TK in 74.4%, 71.4%, and 68.8% of patients, respectively, and was achieved for all 3 parameters in 37.2% of patients. Three factors were independently associated with achievement of all 3 alignment goals: use of PACs/equivalent for surgical planning (P < .001), lower baseline GCA (P = .009), and surgery not including a 3-CO (P = .037).ConclusionsSurgeons failed to achieve goal alignment of each sagittal parameter in ∼25-30% of ASD patients. Goal alignment for all 3 parameters was only achieved in 37.2% of patients. Those at greatest risk were patients with more severe deformity. Advancements are needed to enable more consistent translation of preoperative alignment goals to the operating room.
clinical neurology,orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?