Abstract:Background context: Mechanical complications (MC) are frequently linked to suboptimal postoperative alignment and represent a primary driver of revision surgery in the context of Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD). However, it's worth noting that even among those deemed "well aligned," the risk of experiencing MCs persists, hinting at the potential influence of factors beyond alignment. Purpose: The aim was to assess the incidence of MCs among well-aligned patients and delving into the relevant risk factors and surgical outcomes that come into play within this specific subgroup. Study design/setting: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from a prospective multicenter database dedicated to ASD. Patient sample: The study focused on patients aged 55 years or older, who had a minimum follow-up period of 2 years, and exhibited a Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score of 2 points or less (excluding age) within 6 weeks of their index surgery. Outcome measures: Mechanical complications such as rod fractures, pseudarthrosis, or junctional kyphosis or failure, METHODS: Patients who developed mechanical complications were identified. Comparative analyses were performed, encompassing both continuous and categorical variables. Furthermore, binary logistic regression tests were employed to pinpoint risk factors, and ROC curves were used to determine the optimal threshold values for these variables. Results: A total of 83 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study, with a mean age of 66 years. On average, they had 10 instrumented levels, and 77% of them had fusion extending to the pelvis. Additionally, 27% of the patients had undergone 3-column osteotomies (3-CO). Among them, 33 patients (40%) experienced at least 1 MC during an average follow-up period of 4 years, which included 14 cases of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and 20 cases of nonunion or rod breakage. 15 patients (18%) required revision surgery specifically for MC. In univariable analyses, patients who developed MC were characterized by higher body weight, poorer baseline general health (as indicated by worse SF-36 scores), and less favorable preoperative coronal and sagittal alignment. They also had longer hospital stays, a greater number of instrumented levels, and achieved less favorable postoperative coronal and sagittal alignment. Interestingly, factors such as 3-column osteotomies, postoperative bracing, and the addition of an anterior approach did not significantly alter the risk of MC in well-aligned adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients. Binary regression models revealed that independent risk factors for MC included the residual coronal lumbosacral curve, the number of instrumented levels, and Relative Spinopelvic Alignment (RSA). ROC curves identified an optimal threshold of a residual lumbosacral curve of ≤4° and RSA of ≤3°. Moreover, the rate of MCs showed a stepwise increase within the GAP-Proportioned group, with rates of 31% for GAP=0, 54% for GAP=1, and 75% for GAP=2, with RSA emerging as the most influential parameter. Lastly, patients with MC exhibited poorer functional and radiological outcomes at their last follow-up assessment. Conclusions: The rate of MCs remains elevated in sagittally "well-aligned" ASD patients that can be attributed to suboptimal residual sagittal and coronal malalignment, which in turn leads to poorer functional outcomes. This study reaffirms the multifaceted nature of MCs and underscores the significance of achieving impeccable postoperative alignment, particularly in the presence of additional risk factors such as extensive surgical correction, a high lever arm (involving instrumented vertebrae), excessive body weight, and frailty (as indicated by SF-36 scores).

371 The Impact of Thoracolumbar Inflection Point on Outcomes and Complications in Adult Spinal Deformity

The T4-L1-Hip Axis: Sagittal Spinal Realignment Targets in Long-Construct Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Early Impact

1079 Preoperative Inflection Point According to the Roussouly Classification Is a Predictor of Outcomes Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

Should pelvic incidence influence realignment strategy? A detailed analysis in adult spinal deformity

The more the better? Integration of vertebral pelvic angles (VPA) PJK thresholds to existing alignment schemas for prevention of mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery

Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Transverse Process Hook Placement at the Proximal Thoracic Upper Instrumented Vertebra in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

Predictive factors for acute proximal junctional failure after adult deformity surgery with upper instrumented vertebrae in the thoracolumbar spine.

Restoring L4-S1 Lordosis Shape in Severe Sagittal Deformity: Impact of Correction Techniques on Alignment and Complication Profile

Lumbar Lordosis Redistribution and Segmental Correction in Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD)

Predictors of pelvic tilt normalization: a multicenter study on the impact of regional and lower-extremity compensation on pelvic alignment after complex adult spinal deformity surgery

Long term mechanical failure in well aligned adult spinal deformity patients

Optimal Correction of Adult Spinal Deformities Requires Restoration of Distal Lumbar Lordosis

How Good Are Surgeons at Achieving Their Preoperative Goal Sagittal Alignment Following Adult Deformity Surgery?

Instrumentation Techniques to Prevent Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Correction: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies

Incidence and Risk Factors of Proximal Junctional Complications and Rod Fractures After Long-Segment Fusion Surgery With Anterior Column Realignment for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

1073 Prone Transpsoas (PTP)-LLIF Approach Versus Standard LLIF in Patients Undergoing Surgical Revision Following Adult Spinal Deformity Correction Surgery

Association Between the Upper Instrumented Vertebra Screw Angles and Proximal Junctional Complications in Patients with De Novo Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis.

Impact of Segmental Lordosis Restoration During Degenerative Spinal Fusion on Two-Year Adjacent Segment Disease and Revision Rates

Which Is More Predictive Value for Mechanical Complications: Fixed Thoracolumbar Alignment (T1 Pelvic Angle) Versus Dynamic Global Balance Parameter (Odontoid-Hip Axis Angle)

Mismatch Between Pelvic Incidence and Lumbar Lordosis After Personalized Interbody Fusion: The Importance of Preoperative Planning and Alignment in Degenerative Spine Diseases

Persistent Lower Extremity Compensation for Sagittal Imbalance After Surgical Correction of Complex Adult Spinal Deformity: A Radiographic Analysis of Early Impact