P135. Comparison of elderly patients with spinal deformity fused from the upper versus the lower thoracic/thoracolumbar spine to the sacrum. Prospective evaluation of elderly deformity surgery (PEEDS) study
Zeeshan Sardar,Roy Miller,Scott L. Zuckerman,Stephen J. Lewis,Yong Qiu,Yukihiro Matsuyama,Lawrence G. Lenke,Ferran Pellise,David W. Polly,Christopher I. Shaffrey,Justin S. Smith,Michael P. Kelly,Benny Dahl
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.06.157
IF: 4.297
2024-01-01
The Spine Journal
Abstract:BACKGROUND CONTEXT
In adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, choosing the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) between the upper thoracic (UT) or lower thoracic/thoracolumbar (LT) spine is critical to balancing the risk of perioperative surgical morbidity with durable long-term outcomes. This study seeks to compare outcomes of elderly ASD patients fused to the sacrum from UT vs LT.
PURPOSE
We hypothesized that patients fused to the Upper Thoracic (UT) spine would demonstrate more severe preoperative deformity, increased early complications but similar long-term reoperation probability.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING
Prospective, Multicenter, Observational study of elderly patients over the age of 60 undergoing surgery for spinal deformity.
PATIENT SAMPLE
Elderly patients over the age of 60 undergoing surgery for spinal deformity with fusion extending from the thoracic spine or upper lumbar spine into the sacrum.
OUTCOME MEASURES
Outcomes collected were demographics, radiographic parameters, operative data, complications, reoperation probability, and patients-reported outcome metrics (PROMs)
METHODS
Elderly ASD patients (age 60+) undergoing fusion to the sacrum were divided into UT (UIV T1-T7) and LT (UIV T8-L1) groups and were followed up for up to 5 years. We compared demographics, radiographic parameters, perioperative outcomes, reoperation probability, and patients-reported outcome metrics (PROMs).
RESULTS
A total of 145 ASD patients (80% females; mean age 68.0±5.4) were included. Of those, 42 were in the UT group and 103 in the LT group. Although there was no significant difference in operative times, the UT group had higher estimated blood loss (EBL) than the LT group with a mean of 2163.4cc vs 1569.8cc (p=.01). Both groups had similar postop complication rates 40.5% vs 40.8%. Additionally, long term complications at 2 and 5 years were similar. Preoperatively, the UT group had higher thoracic kyphosis (TK) (p<.05), higher thoracolumbar kyphosis angle (TLA) (p<.001), and higher distal lordosis (p=.006). At the 5-year follow up, UT group demonstrated lower SVA of 33.1mm vs 65.3mm (p=.050) even though preop SVA was not significantly different. The rate of radiographic PJK was not different between groups at all time points. However, the probability of reoperation after 5 years was higher in the UT group (32.1% vs 12.27%; p=0.003). Implant failure was the most common reason for reoperation in both groups (UT: 47%, LT: 28%). Junctional pathology accounted for 10% and 14% of reoperations in the UT and LT groups respectively.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT
Interbody devices (IBD) are commonly used to correct deformity and are more often employed distally at the lumbosacral junction. Assessment of the impact on alignment and outcomes for IBD placed distal to the lumbar lordosis apex relative to those that have an extension of IBD proximal to the apex remains to be evaluated.
PURPOSE
To evaluate whether patients with IBD placed distal to lumbar lordosis apex improved complication rates and outcomes.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING
Retrospective cohort study of a prospectively collected single-center adult spinal deformity database.
PATIENT SAMPLE
ASD.
OUTCOME MEASURES
Outcomes, complications.
METHODS
Operative ASD patients fused from at least L1 and proximal to sacrum were included with complete 2-year data. Patients were stratified based on IBD device distal (D) to postoperative lumbar lordosis apex or proximal (ND) in those who had IBD. Achievement and maintenance of alignment, along with improvement in HRQLs and complications were assessed. Descriptive and means comparison analyses were used. ANCOVA and multivariable logistic regression were utilized to control for age, gender, BMI, osteoporosis, CCI, frailty, and baseline deformity (C7-PLA, PI, PI-LL, PT, SVA, TPA).
RESULTS
A total of 320 patients met inclusion. (Age 64±9, 78% F, BMI 27.5±5.1 kg/m2, frailty 7.3±4.7, CCI 1.9± 1.7). 59% had IBD distal to the apex (D). D was younger (63.2 vs 65.3), had lower BMI (27.0 vs 28.2), CCI (1.8 vs 2.0), and frailty (6.6 vs 8.3) (all p<.05). Baseline deformity in D was lower in T1PA (24.5 vs 28.0, p=.016), with no difference in PT, PI, or PI-LL. No difference in posterior levels fused (mean 12.4), however a greater proportion of ND had osteotomies (88% vs 73%), a greater mean number of 3CO (0.34 vs 0.20), and a lower number of IBs (1.1 vs 2.6) (all p<.05). Mechanical complication rates did not vary amongst D and ND. However, when controlling for covariates, ND had a 2.6x higher likelihood of reoperation due to rod failure or pseudarthrosis (2.613 [1.090-6.264], p=0.031). D had 3x higher odds of achieving MCID in pain (SRS22r pain: 3.316 [1.260-8.725], p=0.015) and 1.6x increased odds of MCID in ODI at 2Y (1.631 [1.021-2.605], p=0.041).
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with interbody device extending proximal to the lumbar lordosis apex had lower rates of reoperation for pseudarthrosis and rod fracture, resulting in greater improvement in pain and disability.
FDA Device/Drug Status
This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.