Abstract:ObjectiveAdjacent segment disease, junctional kyphosis/failure and pseudarthrosis can negatively impact the mid to long-term outcome in spinal deformity surgery. These complications might be influenced by upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) fixation techniques. In this study we analyze key biomechanical properties of three different UIV fixation techniques and define their ideal clinical use based on patient-specific risk profiles using a finite element analysis (FEA) model.MethodsA T9-pelvis posterior instrumented spinal fusion was assumed. Three different FEA models were created based on the UIV fixation technique: T9 pedicle screws (PS); T9 cortical bone screws (CBS); T9 transverse process hooks (TPH). The three FEA models consisted of T8–T10 bone and ligamentous anatomy derived from a CT scan of a healthy patient as well as spinal implants consisting of either pedicle screws, cortical bone screws or transverse process hooks as well as cobalt chromium rods. The FEA models were constrained at T10, axial load as assumed for a healthy 80 kg male during flexion, extension and lateral bending were applied. As surrogate markers for risk of proximal junctional kyphosis, proximal junctional failure, adjacent segment disease and pseudarthrosis the following biomechanical parameters were calculated: UIV range of motion (ROM); intradiscal stress at UIV/UIV + 1; UIV intravertebral stress and screw pull out forces. One-way ANOVA analyses have been performed to compare biomechanical outcome parameters between the three construct variants under investigation.ResultsUIV-ROM was restricted during flexion/extension/lateral bending by: PS: 73%/80%/86%, CBS: 71%/81%/85% and TPH: 62%/76%/85%. Average intradiscal stress at UIV/UIV + 1 during flexion/extension/lateral bending was (Mega Pascal, MPa): PS 0.42/0.44/0.38, CBS 0.49/0.4/0.44, TPH 0.66/0.51/0.58; average intravertebral stress of the UIV superior endplate during flexion/extension/lateral bending was (MPa): PS 2.23/2.12/2.21, CBS 1.87/1.98/1.8, TPH 1.67/0.98/1.53. Screw pull-out forces (N) at UIV during flexion/extension/lateral bending were: PS 476/320/375, CBS 444/245/308. Statistically significant differences were found for intradiscal stress as well as vertebral body average stress (p = 0.02 and p = 0.02).ConclusionDifferent UIV fixation techniques carry different biomechanical properties. Pedicle screw fixation is the most rigid, leading to the highest UIV stress and UIV screw pull out forces. Cortical bones screw fixation is similarly rigid; however, UIV stress and UIV screw pull out is significantly lower. Transverse process hook fixation is the least rigid, with the lowest UIV stress, however highest intradiscal stress at UIV/UIV + 1. Thus, these biomechanical differences may help select optimal UIV fixation techniques according to patient specific risk factors.

Cranially Directed Upper Instrumented Vertebrae Screw Angles Are Associated With Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

Association Between the Upper Instrumented Vertebra Screw Angles and Proximal Junctional Complications in Patients with De Novo Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis.

Upper Instrumented Vertebra–femoral Angle and Correlation with Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adult Spinal Deformity

Effect of Different Types of Upper Instrumented Vertebrae Instruments on Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Pedicle Screw versus Transverse Process Hook

Risk Factors of Proximal Junctional Failure After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The association between lower Hounsfield units of the upper instrumented vertebra and proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity surgery with a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Protective Factors of Preventing Proximal Junctional Kyphosis as the Most Common Complication of Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult scoliosis: comparison of four radiological predictor models

Instrumentation Techniques to Prevent Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Correction: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies

Vertebral Bone Quality Score Independently Predicts Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and/or Failure After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

371 The Impact of Thoracolumbar Inflection Point on Outcomes and Complications in Adult Spinal Deformity

Low-Density Pedicle Screw Constructs Are Associated with Lower Incidence of Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

Clinically relevant biomechanical properties of three different fixation techniques of the upper instrumented vertebra in deformity surgery

[Impact of C 2 -femoral heads center and sacroiliac fixation on the occurrence of post-operative proximal junctional kyphosis in adults with spinal deformity].

Proximal Junctional Kyphosis: Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability of Radiographic Measurements in Adult Spinal Deformity

Cervical Sagittal Alignment Variations and Proximal Junctional Kyphosis after Posterior Fusion of AIS

Screw Placement at the Apex Alters Surgical Outcomes of Moderate Lenke 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Transverse Process Hook Placement at the Proximal Thoracic Upper Instrumented Vertebra in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

Spinal Implant Density and Postoperative Lumbar Lordosis as Predictors for the Development of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adult Spinal Deformity

Risk Factor Analysis for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A New Simple Scoring System to Identify High-Risk Patients

Vertebral bone quality score as a novel predictor of proximal junctional kyphosis after thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery