Abstract:Background Dose area product in water (DAPw) in small fields relies on the use of detectors with a sensitive area larger than the irradiation field. This quantity has recently been used to establish primary standards down to 5 mm field size, with an uncertainty smaller than 0.7%. It has the potential to decrease the uncertainty related to field output factors, but is not currently integrated into treatment planning systems. Purpose This study aimed to explore the feasibility of converting DAPw into a point dose in small fields by determining the volume averaging correction factor. By determining the field output factors, a comparison between the so‐called "DAPw to point dose" approach and the IAEA TRS483 methodology was performed. Method Diodes, microdiamonds, and a micro ionization chamber were used to measure field output factors following the IAEA TRS483 methodology on two similar linacs equipped with circular cones down to 6 mm diameter. For the "DAPw to point dose" approach, measurements were performed with a dedicated and built‐in‐house 3 cm diameter plane‐parallel ionization chamber calibrated in terms of DAPw in the French Primary Dosimetry Standards Laboratory LNE‐LNHB. Beam profile measurements were performed to generate volume averaging correction factors enabling the conversion of an integral DAPw measurement into a point dose and the determination of the field output factors. Both sets of field output factors were compared. Results According to the IAEA TRS483 methodology, field output factors were within ±3% for all detectors on both linacs. Large variations were observed for the volume averaging correction factors with a maximum spread between the detectors of 26% for the smallest field size. Consequently, deviations of up to 15% between the "IAEA TRS483" and the "DAPw to point dose" methodologies were found for the field output factor of the smallest field size. This was attributed to the difficulty in accurately determining beam profiles in small fields. Conclusion Although primary standards associated with small uncertainties can be established in terms of DAPw in a primary laboratory, the "DAPw to point dose" methodology requires volume averaging correction to derive a field output factor from DAPw measurements. None of the point detectors studied provided satisfactory results, and additional work using other detectors, such as film, is still required to allow the transfer of a DAP primary standard to users in terms of absorbed point dose.

Determination of Correction Factors for Small Field Based on Measurement and Numerical Calculation using Cylindrical Ionization Chambers

Measurement of the Wall Correction Factor of a Spherical-cylindrical Cavity Ionization Chamber

Monte Carlo simulation of initial and volume ion recombination correction factor in plane parallel ionization chambers exposed to ion beams

Carbon ion beam dosimetry in magnetic fields using Farmer-type ionization chambers of different radii: measurements and simulations

Monte-Carlo Calculation and Measurement of Wall Correction Factor for Spherical Graphite Ionization Chamber

Assessment of four dose calculation algorithms using IAEA-TECDOC-1583 with medium dependency correction factor (K med ) application

A multi-detector comparison to determine convergence of measured relative output factors for small field dosimetry

Defining field output factors in small fields based on dose area product measurements: A feasibility study

Field Output correction factors of small static field for IBA Razor NanoChamber

Output and $k_{Q_{clin},Q_{msr}}^{f_{clin},f_{msr}}$ correction factors measured and calculated in very small circular fields for microDiamond and EFD-3G detectors

The use of pencil ionization chamber with temporal readout capabilities to measure CT beam full width half maximum

Field output correction factors using a fully characterized plastic scintillation detector

Solving Outside-Axial-Field-Of-View Scatter Correction Problem in Pet Via Digital Experimentation

Absolute dose calibration and output factor simulation for flattened and flattening filter-free Monte Carlo model of 6 MV photon beams

Experimental comparison of cylindrical and plane parallel ionization chambers for reference dosimetry in continuous and pulsed scanned proton beams

Curvature correction factors for the independent verification of monitor units of electron treatment plans calculated in Eclipse

Small field output factor measurement and verification for CyberKnife robotic radiotherapy and radiosurgery system using 3D polymer gel, ionization chamber, diode, diamond and scintillator detectors, Gafchromic film and Monte Carlo simulation

Detector-specific correction factors in radiosurgery beams and their impact on dose distribution calculations

Evaluation of the two-voltage method for parallel-plate ionization chambers irradiated with pulsed beams

Application of the Exradin W1 scintillator to determine Ediode 60017 and microDiamond 60019 correction factors for relative dosimetry within small MV and FFF fields

Verification of TG-61 dose for synchrotron-produced monochromatic x-ray beams using fluence-normalized MCNP5 calculations