Abstract:The first part of this dissertation is on A-optimal designs for stated choice experiments. Stated choice experiments are widely used in areas such as marketing, planning, transportation, medical care, etc. In such studies, a set of n choice sets is presented to the subjects. Each choice set consists of two or more profiles. Subjects are asked to choose their favorite profile from each choice set. Therefore the outcomes of such studies are discrete and nonlinear models are usually used. The multinomial logit model (MNL) is one of the most frequently used models for stated choice experiments. There are discussions in literature about how to generate optimal designs with the MNL model but primarily with the assumption that all profiles are equally attractive. In this dissertation, a new approach is proposed to generate A-optimal designs by the local linearization of the MNL model. Under the assumption that all options are equally attractive, this approach gives the same A-optimal designs as in the literature under the same setting but in a wider class of designs. This approach is also extendable to more general settings when profiles are unequally attractive. The second part of this dissertation deals with sensitivity analysis for computer experiments. Sensitivity analysis is widely used for identifying influential input variables. Two approaches to evaluating sensitivity statistically are (1) estimating global sensitivity indices based on Sobol' variance decomposition, and (2) evaluating local sensitivity indices based on a gradient measure using a one-at-a-time sampling design. Although both approaches have been studied for (hyper-) rectangular input regions, they have not been considered carefully for the non-rectangular input region setting.In this dissertation, a more flexible gradient-based method is proposed to evaluate sensitivity indices for non-rectangular regions. In addition, the use of variable-length gradients is introduced and the importance of the starting design is emphasized. It is shown by examples that the proposed method works well in both the standard and non-rectangular settings.

Optimal choice designs for the main effects plus specified two-factor interaction effects model for binary attributes

Optimal two-level choice designs for the main effects and specified interaction effects model

Optimal two-level designs for partial profile choice experiments

Optimal Designs for Second-Order Interactions in Paired Comparison Experiments with Binary Attributes

Optimal Design for Probit Choice Models with Dependent Utilities

A-optimal and A-efficient Designs for Discrete Choice Experiments

Optimal Designs For Two Non-Interactive Treatment

Two-level D- and A-optimal main-effects designs with run sizes one and two more than a multiple of four

A-efficient Discrete Choice Designs for Attributes with Unequal Numbers of Levels

A -Optimal Designs under a Linearized Model for Discrete Choice Experiments

D-optimal Designs for Multinomial Logistic Models

Optimal $2^K$ Paired Comparison Designs for Third-Order Interactions

Optimal orthogonal designs for experiments with four-level and two-level factors

Bayesian D- and I-optimal designs for choice experiments involving mixtures and process variables

Orthogonal Array Based Locally D-Optimal Designs for Binary Responses in the Presence of Factorial Effects

Robustness of Optimal Designs for 2^2 Experiments with Binary Response

Optimal Designs for 2^k Factorial Experiments with Binary Response

Asymmetrical Factorial Designs Containing Clear Effects

D ‐optimal designs for multi‐response linear models with two groups

Optimal Paired Comparison Block Designs

On A-Optimal Designs for Discrete Choice Experiments and Sensitivity Analysis for Computer Experiments