Abstract:Under a generalised estimating equation analysis approach, approximate design theory is used to determine Bayesian D-optimal designs. For two examples, considering simple exchangeable and exponential decay correlation structures, we compare the efficiency of identified optimal designs to balanced stepped-wedge designs and corresponding stepped-wedge designs determined by optimising using a normal approximation approach. The dependence of the Bayesian D-optimal designs on the assumed correlation structure is explored; for the considered settings, smaller decay in the correlation between outcomes across time periods, along with larger values of the intra-cluster correlation, leads to designs closer to a balanced design being optimal. Unlike for normal data, it is shown that the optimal design need not be centro-symmetric in the binary outcome case. The efficiency of the Bayesian D-optimal design relative to a balanced design can be large, but situations are demonstrated in which the advantages are small. Similarly, the optimal design from a normal approximation approach is often not much less efficient than the Bayesian D-optimal design. Bayesian D-optimal designs can be readily identified for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with binary outcome data. In certain circumstances, principally ones with strong time period effects, they will indicate that a design unlikely to have been identified by previous methods may be substantially more efficient. However, they require a larger number of assumptions than existing optimal designs, and in many situations existing theory under a normal approximation will provide an easier means of identifying an efficient design for binary outcome data.

Orthogonal Array Based Locally D-Optimal Designs for Binary Responses in the Presence of Factorial Effects

Optimal Designs for 2^k Factorial Experiments with Binary Response

LOCALLY D-OPTIMAL DESIGNS FOR HIERARCHICAL RESPONSE EXPERIMENTS

D ‐optimal designs for multi‐response linear models with two groups

D-optimal Designs for Multinomial Logistic Models

Optimal orthogonal designs for experiments with four-level and two-level factors

Covariate-adjusted response-adaptive designs for generalized linear models

Robustness of Optimal Designs for 2^2 Experiments with Binary Response

Using particle swarm optimization to search for locally $D$-optimal designs for mixed factor experiments with binary response

R-optimal designs for multi-response regression models with multi-factors

$D$-Optimal and Nearly $D$-Optimal Exact Designs for Binary Response on the Ball

Locally $D$-optimal Designs for a Wider Class of Non-linear Models on the $k$-dimensional Ball with applications to logit and probit models

Optimal designs for dose–response models with linear effects of covariates

ForLion: a new algorithm for D-optimal designs under general parametric statistical models with mixed factors

Optimal designs for multiple treatments with unequal variances

Optimal allocation of sample size for randomization-based inference from 2 K factorial designs

A New Family of Covariate-Adjusted Response Adaptive Designs and Their Properties

Optimal Bayesian stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial designs for binary outcome data

A note on locally optimal designs for generalized linear models with restricted support

Two-level D- and A-optimal main-effects designs with run sizes one and two more than a multiple of four

D-optimal Approximate Design for Binary Regression and Quantal Response in Toxicology Studies