Abstract:BackgroundIn biomedical research, response variables are often encountered which have bounded support on the open unit interval - (0,1). Traditionally, researchers have attempted to estimate covariate effects on these types of response data using linear regression. Alternative modelling strategies may include: beta regression, variable-dispersion beta regression, and fractional logit regression models. This study employs a Monte Carlo simulation design to compare the statistical properties of the linear regression model to that of the more novel beta regression, variable-dispersion beta regression, and fractional logit regression models.MethodsIn the Monte Carlo experiment we assume a simple two sample design. We assume observations are realizations of independent draws from their respective probability models. The randomly simulated draws from the various probability models are chosen to emulate average proportion/percentage/rate differences of pre-specified magnitudes. Following simulation of the experimental data we estimate average proportion/percentage/rate differences. We compare the estimators in terms of bias, variance, type-1 error and power. Estimates of Monte Carlo error associated with these quantities are provided.ResultsIf response data are beta distributed with constant dispersion parameters across the two samples, then all models are unbiased and have reasonable type-1 error rates and power profiles. If the response data in the two samples have different dispersion parameters, then the simple beta regression model is biased. When the sample size is small (N0 = N1 = 25) linear regression has superior type-1 error rates compared to the other models. Small sample type-1 error rates can be improved in beta regression models using bias correction/reduction methods. In the power experiments, variable-dispersion beta regression and fractional logit regression models have slightly elevated power compared to linear regression models. Similar results were observed if the response data are generated from a discrete multinomial distribution with support on (0,1).ConclusionsThe linear regression model, the variable-dispersion beta regression model and the fractional logit regression model all perform well across the simulation experiments under consideration. When employing beta regression to estimate covariate effects on (0,1) response data, researchers should ensure their dispersion sub-model is properly specified, else inferential errors could arise.

Sample size and optimal design for logistic regression with binary interaction

Sample size determination for logistic regression revisited

Bootstrap method-based estimation on the confidence interval for additive interaction in cohort studies

Sample Size and Power Determination for a Binary Outcome and an Ordinal Exposure when Logistic Regression Analysis Is Planned

Model-based optimal randomization procedure for treatment–covariate interaction tests

The hidden factor: accounting for covariate effects in power and sample size computation for a binary trait

Sample size determination for logistic regression on a logit-normal distribution

Covariate-adjusted response-adaptive designs for generalized linear models

D-optimal Designs for Multinomial Logistic Models

On the comparison of regression coefficients across multiple logistic models with binary predictors

Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model using multinomial logistic regression

Using a monotonic density ratio model to increase the power of the goodness-of-fit test for logistic regression models with case-control data

Point and interval estimation of exposure effects and interaction between the exposures based on logistic model for observational studies

Effect size, statistical power, and sample size for assessing interactions between categorical and continuous variables

Orthogonal Array Based Locally D-Optimal Designs for Binary Responses in the Presence of Factorial Effects

A Monte Carlo simulation study comparing linear regression, beta regression, variable-dispersion beta regression and fractional logit regression at recovering average difference measures in a two sample design

No rationale for 1 variable per 10 events criterion for binary logistic regression analysis

Design and analysis considerations for comparing dynamic treatment regimens with binary outcomes from sequential multiple assignment randomized trials

An Information Analysis on Modeling Interaction Effects in Logistic Regression

Sample Size and Power Calculations with Correlated Binary Data

Testing Treatment Effects in Unconfounded Studies under Model Misspecification: Logistic Regression, Discretization, and Their Combination.