Abstract:Consider two treatments and a combination of them. Given n available experimental units, the problem is to determine the number of units n, to be assigned to the first treatment, n 2 to the second, and n, to the combination, n = Σ i , n i , n i ≥ 0, i = 1, 2, 3, subject to suitable optimality criteria. This study was motivated by an example of a weighing design with n = 18. n 1 = 2. n 2 = 9, n s = 7 given by Box and Tiao [2, Section 2.7.3]. The allocation seemed far from optimal leading to the present investigation. Four models are developed for two non-interactive treatments and the combination of them. They may be described as 1. A weighing model, 2. A sum of independent random variables model, 3. A mixtures model, and 4. A factorial model. Three optimality criteria are considered: 1. D-optimality, 2. A-optimality and 3. minimization of the variance of the difference of estimators of the two treatment means. It is shown for all criteria for Models 2, 3, 4 and for Criterion 3 for Model I that n s = 0, n 1 = n 2 = n/2 if n is even, n 1 = (n + 1)/2. n 2 = (n – 1)/2 if n is odd. But rather different optimal designs are obtained for Criteria 1 and 2 and Model I, different for the two criteria and different also from the design of the Box-Tiao example. The results presented here are of interest for two reasons. They have intrinsic interest showing that the choice of model and optimality criterion may lead to an intuitively unexpected design in a simple experimental situation. They have instructional interest providing elementary illustrations of modern design concepts that may be used as class examples or problems for solution.

Optimal $2^K$ Paired Comparison Designs for Third-Order Interactions

Optimal Designs for Second-Order Interactions in Paired Comparison Experiments with Binary Attributes

Optimal Paired Comparison Block Designs

Optimal two-level designs for partial profile choice experiments

Optimal orthogonal designs for experiments with four-level and two-level factors

Optimal Designs For Two Non-Interactive Treatment

Optimal two-level choice designs for the main effects and specified interaction effects model

Optimal choice designs for the main effects plus specified two-factor interaction effects model for binary attributes

Efficient Designs in Small Blocks for Comparing Consecutive Pairs of Treatments

Two-level D- and A-optimal main-effects designs with run sizes one and two more than a multiple of four

Optimal Designs for 2^k Factorial Experiments with Binary Response

Optimal designs for testing pairwise differences: A graph‐based game theoretic approach

Optimality of Matched-Pair Designs in Randomized Controlled Trials

Optimal allocation of sample size for randomization-based inference from 2 K factorial designs

Comparing three groups

Better Experimental Design by Hybridizing Binary Matching with Imbalance Optimization

Optimal designs for crossover model with partial interactions

Optimal designs for the proportional interference model

$E$-optimal designs for second-order response surface models

Mixed-level designs with orthogonality and relatively optimal run order

The Pairwise Matching Design is Optimal under Extreme Noise and Assignments