Abstract:The science of modelling choice preferences has evolved into an interdisciplinary field contributing to several branches of microeconomics and mathematical psychology. As theories in decision science and related fields mature, descriptive theories have emerged to explain systematic violations of rationality through cognitive mechanisms underlying the thought processes that guide human behaviour. Cognitive limitations are not, however, solely responsible for systematic deviations from rationality and there is a growing body of literature exploring the effect of visceral factors as the more dominant drivers. This study builds on the existing literature by investigating the impact of anger, sadness, happiness, anxiety, hunger, energy, tiredness and stress on three distinct elements that define risk preference: utility, decision weights and loss aversion. By decomposing the impact of visceral factors on risk preference, I am able to provide evidence supporting the proposition that a portion of the variability in individual choice preferences can be explained by interacting visceral states. My findings suggest that visceral factors have the strongest effect on loss aversion, which is a major factor in how people code and evaluate financial outcomes. Anger, sadness, happiness, anxiety, energy and tiredness each affect five or more of the model parameters, while hunger and stress are significant only in their interaction with other visceral factors. I also provide evidence to show that the generalized approaches to characterizing visceral factors and risk preference are too broad to be descriptively meaningful. The results of this study show that emotions and other drive states effect the way people process and interpret information, which is crucial in informing decision-makers of the sources and consequences of irrational behaviour. These findings will be of immediate interest to wealth management specialists, public relations advisers as well as to engineers in designing socially intelligent machines capable of interacting more effectively with humans.

Does risk aversion increase the value of mortality risk?

Myopic Loss Aversion or Equate-to-differentiate Heuristic? A Heuristic Decision Making Model for Both Single and Aggregated Plays.

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RELATIVE RISK AVERSION AND THE LEVEL OF EDUCATION: A SURVEY AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DEMAND FOR LIFE INSURANCE

Risk preferences over health: empirical estimates and implications for medical decision-making

Is Relative Risk Aversion Constant? A Reinterpretation of Recent Asset Allocation Findings at the Micro Level

Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices

Risk Breeds Risk Aversion

How Uncertainty Matters Under Risk Neutrality

Comparative risk aversion in two periods: An application to self‐insurance and self‐protection

Looming Large or Seeming Small? Attitudes Towards Losses in a Representative Sample

Risk aversion as an evolutionary adaptation

Considering Risk Aversion in Economic Evaluation: A Rank Dependent Approach

The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: A life history theory approach.

Three gaps and what they may mean for risk preference

The impact of risk aversion and ambiguity aversion on annuity and saving choices

Dynamic Estimates Of The Arrow-Pratt Absolute And Relative Risk Aversion Coefficients

Risk and emotion: measuring the effect of emotions and other visceral factors on decision making under risk

The marginal cost of mortality risk reduction: Evidence from housing markets

Economic Value of Reducing Exposure to Environmental Health Risks

The Importance of Risk Preference Parameters in Prospect Theory: Evidence from Mutual Fund Flows

Are decisions under risk malleable?