Abstract:Changes in risk preference have been reported when making a series of independent risky choices or non-foraging economic decisions. Behavioral economics has put forward various explanations for specific effects on risk preference in non-foraging tasks, but a consensus regarding the general principle underlying these effects has not been reached. In contrast, recent studies have investigated human economic risky choices using tasks adapted from foraging theory, which require consideration of past choices and future opportunities to make optimal decisions. In these foraging tasks, human economic risky choices are explained by the ethological principle of fitness maximization, which naturally leads to dynamic risk preference. Here, we conducted two online experiments to investigate whether the principle of fitness maximization can explain risk preference dynamics in a non-foraging task. Participants were asked to make a series of independent risky economic decisions while the environmental richness changed. We found that participants' risk preferences were influenced by the current and past environments, making them more risk-averse during and after the rich environment compared to the poor environment. These changes in risk preference align with fitness maximization. Our findings suggest that the ethological principle of fitness maximization might serve as a generalizable principle for explaining dynamic preferences, including risk preference, in human economic decision-making. Decision-making involving probabilistic outcomes (i.e., under risk) is an integral part of our daily lives. Empirical studies have shown that risky behavior often deviates from standard economic theory, and peoples' risk preferences change depending on their psychological and physiological states, and the context of the decision. While previous studies have developed empirical mathematical models to provide mechanistic explanations of these effects, there is no unifying principle that explains why human risky decision-making is tuned this way. Here, we document one such context effect and suggest that this effect can be explained by the ethological principle of fitness maximization. In our study, participants made sequential independent risky decisions in different environments. We found that environments in which it was easy to get large rewards (rich environment) increased participants' risk-aversiveness both during and after experiencing them, and experiencing poor environments increased risk taking behavior. The foregoing modulations of risk-aversiveness are predicted if participants make decisions to satisfy some internal threshold for minimum reward gain, akin to reaching a minimum threshold for survival, rather than to maximize reward gain. Our results suggest that a better understanding of human economic behavior may be achieved under the principle of fitness maximization.

Risk aversion as an evolutionary adaptation

Risk preference as an outcome of evolutionarily adaptive learning mechanisms: An evolutionary simulation under diverse risky environments

Evolutionary foundation for heterogeneity in risk aversion

Risk Aversion in Non-Ergodic Systems

The evolution of social behaviors and risk preferences in settings with uncertainty

Evolution, heritable risk, and skewness loving

Evolution of social learning when high expected payoffs are associated with high risk of failure

Chimpanzee and Human Risk Preferences Show Key Similarities

Foraging in a non-foraging task: Fitness maximization explains human risk preference dynamics under changing environment

Life history variables and risk-taking propensity

Evolution of value-based decision-making preferences in the population

Risk sensitivity and assortment in social dilemmas

Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices

Rapid Changes in Risk Preferences Originate from Bayesian Inference on Parietal Magnitude Representations

Evolution of Risk-Taking Behaviour and Status Preferences in Anti-coordination Games

Risking your Tail: Modeling Individual Differences in Risk-sensitive Exploration using Bayes Adaptive Markov Decision Processes

Risk Preferences of Learning Algorithms

Three gaps and what they may mean for risk preference

Risk evaluation and behaviour: defining appropriate frames of reference

Risk Breeds Risk Aversion

Looming Large or Seeming Small? Attitudes Towards Losses in a Representative Sample