Abstract:Behavior in social dilemmas is often inconsistent with the predictions of classical game theory: people (and a wide variety of other organisms) are more cooperative than might be expected. Here we consider behavior in one such social dilemma, the Traveler's Dilemma, that has received considerable attention in the economics literature but is little known among theoretical biologists. The rules of the game are as follows. Two players each choose a value between R and M, where 0<R<M. If the players choose the same value, both receive that amount. If the players choose different values v(1) and v(2), where v(1)<v(2), then the player choosing v(1) receives v(1)+R and the player choosing v(2) receives v(1)-R. While the players would maximize their payoffs by both choosing the largest allowed value, M, the Nash equilibrium is to choose the smallest allowed value, R. In behavioral experiments, however, people generally choose values much larger than the minimum and the deviation from the expected equilibrium decreases with R. In this paper, we show that the cooperative behavior observed in the Traveler's Dilemma can be explained in an evolutionary framework. We study stochastic evolutionary dynamics in finite populations with varying intensity of selection and varying mutation rate. We derive analytic results showing that strategies choosing high values can be favored when selection is weak. More generally, selection favors strategies that choose high values if R is small (relative to M) and strategies that choose low values if R is large. Finally, we show that a two-parameter model involving the intensity of selection and the mutation rate can quantitatively reproduce data that from a Traveler's Dilemma experiment. These results demonstrate the power of evolutionary game theory for explaining human behavior in contexts that are challenging for standard economic game theory.

Risk sensitivity and assortment in social dilemmas

The evolution of social behaviors and risk preferences in settings with uncertainty

Evolutionary Dynamics Drives Role Specialization in a Community of Players

Stochastic evolutionary dynamics resolve the Traveler's Dilemma

Risk aversion can promote cooperation

Cooperation and competition between pair and multi-player social games in spatial populations

Evolutionary consequences of behavioral diversity

A Model of Risk and Mental State Shifts during Social Interaction

The Communality of Risk: Differentiating the Logic of Risk Governance Based on Evolutionary Game Theory

Risk-driven migration and the collective-risk social dilemma

Social goods dilemmas in heterogeneous societies

Impact of Small Groups with Heterogeneous Preference on Behavioral Evolution in Population Evacuation.

Evolution of conditional cooperation in collective-risk social dilemma with repeated group interactions

Coevolutionary dynamics via adaptive feedback in collective-risk social dilemma game

Evolution of Risk-Taking Behaviour and Status Preferences in Anti-coordination Games

Navigating Uncertainty: Risk-Averse vs. Risk-Prone Strategies in Populations Facing Demographic and Environmental Stochasticity

Cooperation with dynamic asymmetric evaluation in complex networks from a risk perspective

Solving the collective-risk social dilemma with risky assets in well-mixed and structured populations

Temporal Evolution of Risk Behavior in a Disease Spread Simulation

Towards Rock-paper-scissors patterns in the Optional Public Goods Game under random mobility

Evolution of social learning when high expected payoffs are associated with high risk of failure