Abstract:The existing literature is inconsistent about how social comparison affects risk attitudes. We propose a framework where the total utility is composed of the social and financial utilities. The financial utility is consistent with prospect theory (i.e., an S-shaped utility function with a financial reference point), whereas the social utility is affected by both social and financial reference points. Therefore, social risk attitudes are determined by interaction between gains/losses in both social and financial contexts. On the basis of safety-first principle, we propose that when experiencing financial gains, individuals tend to seek upside potential and take social risks (i.e., a convex social utility function). In contrast, when facing financial losses, people would be more risk seeking in social gains but more risk averse in social losses to maximize security (i.e., an inverse S-shaped utility function). We also propose that the relative importance of financial and social utilities depends on the saliency of the reference points and size of stakes. Studies 1 and 2 showed that individuals were risk seeking in both social gains and losses with social reference points alone. Studies 3 and 4 demonstrated that when both financial and social reference points were salient, participants were risk averse in both social gains and losses when facing financial gains, but risk seeking in social gains and risk averse in social losses when facing financial losses. The hypotheses derived from the theoretical framework were in general supported by our experiments. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Is Relative Risk Aversion Constant? A Reinterpretation of Recent Asset Allocation Findings at the Micro Level

Mean-variance portfolio with wealth and volatility dependent risk aversion

Risk Preferences and Efficiency of Household Portfolios

Dynamic Estimates Of The Arrow-Pratt Absolute And Relative Risk Aversion Coefficients

Asset Prices and Risk Aversion

Does risk aversion increase the value of mortality risk?

Portfolio choice in the model of expected utility with a safety-first component

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RELATIVE RISK AVERSION AND THE LEVEL OF EDUCATION: A SURVEY AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DEMAND FOR LIFE INSURANCE

Comparative risk aversion in two periods: An application to self‐insurance and self‐protection

A Note on Risk Aversion

Risk Aversion and Insurance Propensity

Why risk attitude differs between macro and micro level? A decoherence perspective

Precautionary Investment in Wealth and Health

Can Risk Preference Lead to Greater Wealth Accumulation?

Asset Allocation and CAPM Based on Relative Value-at-Risk

Research on the optimal consumption and portfolio of assets based on constant absolute risk aversion utility function

Endogenous time-varying risk aversion and asset returns

Research on the Porfolio Selection of Risk-Averse Investors

Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices

Double Reference Points: the Effects of Social and Financial Reference Points on Decisions under Risk

Just Who Are You Calling Risk Averse?