A Non-Parametric Test of Risk Aversion

Jacob K Goeree,Bernardo Garcia-Pola

2023-08-04

Abstract:In economics, risk aversion is modeled via a concave Bernoulli utility within the expected-utility paradigm. We propose a simple test of expected utility and concavity. We find little support for either: only 30 percent of the choices are consistent with a concave utility, only two out of 72 subjects are consistent with expected utility, and only one of them fits the economic model of risk aversion. Our findings contrast with the preponderance of seemingly "risk-averse" choices that have been elicited using the popular multiple-price list methodology, a result we replicate in this paper. We demonstrate that this methodology is unfit to measure risk aversion, and that the high prevalence of risk aversion it produces is due to parametric misspecification.

General Economics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the measurement methods of risk preference in economics and proposes a new non-parametric test method to test the risk aversion hypothesis in expected utility theory. Specifically, the paper attempts to address the following issues:

1. **Assessing the effectiveness of existing risk preference measurement methods**: The paper points out that existing risk preference measurement methods (especially those based on multiple price lists) have inconsistencies, which limit the external validity of laboratory experiment results in the real world.

2. **Proposing a new non-parametric test method**: The author proposes a simple non-parametric test method to directly test two key assumptions in expected utility theory: probability linearity and the concavity of the utility function. This method involves comparing the choices between a benchmark lottery and two related lotteries.

3. **Validating the effectiveness of the new method**: The paper experimentally validates the effectiveness of the proposed non-parametric test method and finds that it can reveal that subjects' choices do not support the traditional risk aversion hypothesis.

4. **Evaluating the limitations of the multiple price list method**: The paper also discusses the limitations of the multiple price list method in measuring risk preference, particularly when this method relies on specific assumptions about the form of the utility function (such as constant relative risk aversion), which may lead to parameter misspecification.

In summary, the main purpose of the paper is to provide a more reliable tool for measuring risk preference and to reveal the limitations of traditional methods in practical applications. Through experimental evidence, the author shows that the choices of most individuals do not support the risk aversion hypothesis under expected utility theory, and this phenomenon may be due to the unreasonable parameter assumptions of traditional measurement methods.