Abstract:The science of modelling choice preferences has evolved into an interdisciplinary field contributing to several branches of microeconomics and mathematical psychology. As theories in decision science and related fields mature, descriptive theories have emerged to explain systematic violations of rationality through cognitive mechanisms underlying the thought processes that guide human behaviour. Cognitive limitations are not, however, solely responsible for systematic deviations from rationality and there is a growing body of literature exploring the effect of visceral factors as the more dominant drivers. This study builds on the existing literature by investigating the impact of anger, sadness, happiness, anxiety, hunger, energy, tiredness and stress on three distinct elements that define risk preference: utility, decision weights and loss aversion. By decomposing the impact of visceral factors on risk preference, I am able to provide evidence supporting the proposition that a portion of the variability in individual choice preferences can be explained by interacting visceral states. My findings suggest that visceral factors have the strongest effect on loss aversion, which is a major factor in how people code and evaluate financial outcomes. Anger, sadness, happiness, anxiety, energy and tiredness each affect five or more of the model parameters, while hunger and stress are significant only in their interaction with other visceral factors. I also provide evidence to show that the generalized approaches to characterizing visceral factors and risk preference are too broad to be descriptively meaningful. The results of this study show that emotions and other drive states effect the way people process and interpret information, which is crucial in informing decision-makers of the sources and consequences of irrational behaviour. These findings will be of immediate interest to wealth management specialists, public relations advisers as well as to engineers in designing socially intelligent machines capable of interacting more effectively with humans.

Strength of preference and risk attitude in utility measurement

Risk Preference: A View from Psychology

Measuring Price Risk Aversion through Indirect Utility Functions: A Laboratory Experiment

Three gaps and what they may mean for risk preference

Asymmetry of Risk and Value of Information

Risk and emotion: measuring the effect of emotions and other visceral factors on decision making under risk

Risk preferences over health: empirical estimates and implications for medical decision-making

Uncertain Expected Utility Function and Its Risk Premium

Stochastic Monotonicity and Random Utility Models: The Good and The Ugly

Understanding Risky Choice Behaviour with Travel Time Variability: a Review of Recent Empirical Contributions of Alternative Behavioural Theories

A Non-Parametric Test of Risk Aversion

Parameters of Social Preference Functions: Measurement and External Validity

Valuing Travel Time Variability Within A Rank-Dependent Utility Framework and an Investigation of Unobserved Taste Heterogeneity

Approximate Expected Utility Rationalization

Nonparametric Analysis of Random Utility Models Robust to Nontransitive Preferences

An elicitation of utility for quality of life under prospect theory

Utility of Income As a Random Function: Behavioral Characterization and Empirical Evidence.

Double Reference Points: the Effects of Social and Financial Reference Points on Decisions under Risk

Measuring Consumer Risk-Return Tradeoffs

Risk Preference in Economics of Uncertainty

Probability Premium and Attitude Towards Probability