Abstract:Purpose: To improve the effectivity of patient-specific finite element analysis (FEA) to predict refractive power change (RPC) in rigid Ortho-K contact lens fitting. Novel eyelid boundary detection is introduced to the FEA model to better model the effects of the lid on lens performance, and stress and strain outcomes are investigated to identify the most effective FEA components to use in modelling. Methods: The current study utilises fully anonymised records of 249 eyes, 132 right eyes, and 117 left eyes from subjects aged 14.1 ± 4.0 years on average (range 9 to 38 years), which were selected for secondary analysis processing. A set of custom-built MATLAB codes was built to automate the process from reading Medmont E300 height and distance files to processing and displaying FEA stress and strain outcomes. Measurements from before and after contact lens wear were handled to obtain the corneal surface change in shape and power. Tangential refractive power maps were constructed from which changes in refractive power pre- and post-Ortho-K wear were determined as the refractive power change (RPC). A total of 249 patient-specific FEA with innovative eyelid boundary detection and 3D construction analyses were automatically built and run for every anterior eye and lens combination while the lens was located in its clinically detected position. Maps of four stress components: contact pressure, Mises stress, pressure, and maximum principal stress were created in addition to maximum principal logarithmic strain maps. Stress and strain components were compared to the clinical RPC maps using the two-dimensional (2D) normalised cross-correlation and structural similarity (SSIM) index measure. Results: On the one hand, the maximum principal logarithmic strain recorded the highest moderate 2D cross-correlation area of 8.6 ± 10.3%, and contact pressure recorded the lowest area of 6.6 ± 9%. Mises stress recorded the second highest moderate 2D cross-correlation area with 8.3 ± 10.4%. On the other hand, when the SSIM index was used to compare the areas that were most similar to the clinical RPC, maximum principal stress was the most similar, with an average strong similarity percentage area of 26.5 ± 3.3%, and contact pressure was the least strong similarity area of 10.3 ± 7.3%. Regarding the moderate similarity areas, all components were recorded at around 34.4% similarity area except the contact pressure, which was down to 32.7 ± 5.8%. Conclusions: FEA is an increasingly effective tool in being able to predict the refractive outcome of Ortho-K treatment. Its accuracy depends on identifying which clinical and modelling metrics contribute to the most accurate prediction of RPC with minimal ocular complications. In terms of clinical metrics, age, Intra-ocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), surface topography, lens decentration and the 3D eyelid effect are all important for effective modelling. In terms of FEA components, maximum principal stress was found to be the best FEA barometer that can be used to predict the performance of Ortho-K lenses. In contrast, contact pressure provided the worst stress performance. In terms of strain, the maximum principal logarithmic strain was an effective strain barometer.

Aspects of wet cell measurement of back vertex power of contact lenses

The refractive index of contact lens saline solutions

Overcoming the Error of Optical Power Measurement Caused by the Curvature Radius.

Verification of the vertex powers of varifocal rigid contact lenses

Calibration Error on the Measurement of Back Vertex Power for Contact Lenses with Method Using Focimeter with Manual Focusing

Compare the Accuracy of Different Methods to Estimate Human Lens Power in the Refractive Development of Children

Tear-film evaporation flux and its relationship to tear properties in symptomatic and asymptomatic soft-contact-lens wearers

Comparison of Two Optical Biometers in Intraocular Lens Power Calculation

In Vitro Evaluation of Soft Contact Lens Wettability With a Nonmodified Commercial Videokeratoscope

Spatially resolved wavefront aberrations of ophthalmic progressive-power lenses in normal viewing conditions

Intraocular lens power calculations after myopic laser refractive surgery: a comparison of methods in 173 eyes

Inter-laboratory reproducibility of power measurement of toric hydrogel lenses using the focimeter and the Moiré deflectometer

Evaluation of repeatability and agreement of two optical biometers for intraocular lens power calculation

Accuracy of WASCA Aberrometer Refraction Compared to Manifest Refraction and Cycloplegic Refraction in Hyperopia Measurement

Determining corneal power using Orbscan II videokeratography for intraocular lens calculation after excimer laser surgery for myopia

Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power

Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Methods Following Myopic Laser Refractive Surgery: New Options Using a Rotating Scheimpflug Camera

Refractive power profiles of commercially available soft multifocal contact lenses for myopia control

Clinical measurement of anterior chamber depth and lens thickness in myopic eyes with ultrasound and pentacam scheinpflug system

FEA-Based Stress-Strain Barometers as Forecasters for Corneal Refractive Power Change in Orthokeratology

Comparison of accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 29.0 mm