Compare the Accuracy of Different Methods to Estimate Human Lens Power in the Refractive Development of Children

Zhu Mengjun,Qu Xiaomei,He Xiangui,Zhao Huijuan,Zhu Jianfeng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845x.2014.09.008

2014-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the accuracy of different methods for calculating human lens power when lens thickness is not available and find suitable methods for large-scale studies of refractive development.Methods In this cross-sectional survey,lens power was calculated by three different methods.The three methods used the biometry and refraction data of 378 emmetropic eyes of 189 subjects (age range,7-14 years).These three methods consist of the Bennett method,which uses lens thickness,and a modification of the Stenstr(o)m method and the Bennett-Rabbetts method,both of which do not require knowledge of lens thickness.Lens powers calculated with the modifiedStenstr(o)m and Bennett-Rabbetts methods were compared for accuracy to those calculated with the Bennett method.Data were analyzed by a paired sign test,Wilcoxon rank sum test and Pearson correlation analysis.Results Using the Gullstrand-Emsley and Bennett-Rabbetts eye models,the modified-Stenstr(o)m method gave lens powers that were approximately 0.46±0.35 D and 0.29±0.35 D lower than the Bennett lens powers and were significantly different from it (signrank=-159.5,-120,P＜0.01).The Bennett-Rabbetts method gave lens powers that were approximately 0.27±0.35 D and 0.09±0.34 D lower and were significantly different from the Bennett lens powers (signrank=-112.5,-42,P＜0.01).By customizing the c constants,the differences in the two methods were remarkably reduced to nonsignificance (signrank=5,P＞0.05).The largest difference was just 1.35 D.Agreement with the Bennett method was within ±0.50 D for 85.4％ of the eyes.The lens power differences determined with the Bennett and Bennett-Rabbetts methods decreased with age for children 7-12 years old and increased with age for children above 12 years old (x2=314.53,P＜0.01).The power difference between the two methods had a negative correlation with age (r=-0.36,P＜0.01).Conclusion With appropriately customized constants,the Bennett-Rabbetts method provides a good approximation of the Bennett lens power in emmetropic eyes.However,the agreement between the two methods for myopia and hyperopia needs further study.