Effects of different corrective methods on peripheral refraction in children

陈志,周行涛,瞿小妹,李梅,宫文静

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2010.01.008

2010-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate the effects of different corrective methods on ocular pe-ripheral refraction in children. Methods This was a self-controlled cross-sectional study. Fifteen children were required to gaze at 7 successive targets at distances from 30° nasal to 30° temporal, wearing no lenses, fully corrected trim lenses or rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses. An infrared au-torefractor was used to obtain six peripheral refractions and one central refraction under each condi-tion. The difference between the peripheral refraction and central refraction was calculated as the rel-ative peripheral refraction (RPR). RPRs were compared in each direction among these three conditions using one-way ANOVA. If there was a statistically significant difference, a Bonferroni post-hoc test was used. Results All RPRs were hyperepic under these three conditions (except for those at 10° nasal) and showed asymmetry between nasal and temporal sides, with higher hyperopia in the periph-ery and during temporal gaze. RGP lenses reduced this hyperopia to a relatively small amplitude, that was more evident in the peripheral temporal side. RPR values reached (1.69±1.03)D, (1.84± 0.99)D and (0.81±1.28)D up to 30° temporal with the three respective conditions. These differences were statistically significant (F=3.79, P=0.031). The Bonferroni test also showed a statistically signifi- cant difference between the trial lens and RGP conditions (P=0.043). Conclusion Wearing RGP lenses has the effect of altering temporal peripheral refraction, whereas conventional glasses do not. If converting relative peripheral hyperopia to relative peripheral myopia is a reliable approach for con-trolling myopia progression, wearing RGP lenses is a good alternative.