Analysis of peripheral refraction and adaptability with mid-periphery additional designed lenses in situ

YAO Pei-jun,ZHOU Xing-tao,CHU Ren-yuan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-2420.2012.04.006
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effects of a series of specially designed spectacle lenses on peripheral refraction,peripheral clear vision field and subjective evaluation. Methods Three subjects (4 eyes) aged 22 to 31 years,with a refraction of -2. 0 D were enrolled. They underwent peripheral refraction,peripheral clear vision field measurement and subjective evaluation with 5 consecutive lenses in situ in a randomized manner,including regular aspheric lens,MyoVision lens,Stop lenses with respectively small,medium and large optical zones. Subjective evaluation included the degrees of comfort,clearness and acceptability both at distance and at near. Results All tested eyes had a relatively hyperopic peripheral refraction with any of the five lenses in situ,with the degree of hyperopia increasing towards the periphery. Peripheral refraction is the most hyperopic with regular aspheric lens and Stop lens with large optical zone,followed by Stop lens with medium optical zone. The least peripheral hyperopia was seen in eyes with MyoVision lens and Stop lens with small optical zone. Peripheral clear vision field was largest with regular aspheric lens and Stop lens with large optical zone,moderate with Stop lens with medium optical zone,and smallest with MyoVision lens and Stop lens with small optical zone. Subjective evaluation at distance was the highest with regular aspheric lens, followed by Stop lens with large optical zone and medium optical zone,the lowest with MyoVision lens and Stop lens with small optical zone. Subjective evaluation at near was the highest with regular aspheric lens and Stop lens with large optical zone,followed by Stop lens with medium optical zone and MyoVision lens,the lowest with Stop lens with small optical zone. Conclusions Lenses with different mid-periphery additional designs differed in their effects on peripheral refraction,whose intensity was negatively correlated to adaptability with lenses in situ.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?