Abstract:Correlations between the intrinsic shapes of galaxies and the large-scale galaxy density field provide an important tool to investigate galaxy intrinsic alignments, which constitute the major potential astrophysical systematic in cosmological weak lensing (cosmic shear) surveys, but also yield insight into the formation and evolution of galaxies. We measure galaxy position-shape correlations in the MegaZ-LRG sample for more than 800 000 luminous red galaxies for comoving transverse separations of 0.3 < r(p) < 60 h(-1) Mpc, making the first such measurement with a photometric redshift sample. In combination with a re-analysis of several spectroscopic SDSS samples, we constrain an intrinsic alignment model for early-type galaxies over long baselines in redshift (z less than or similar to 0.7) and luminosity (4 mag) with high statistical precision.We develop and test the formalism to incorporate photometric redshift scatter in the modelling of these observations. For r(p) > 6 h(-1) Mpc, the fits to galaxy position-shape correlation functions are consistent with the scaling with rp and redshift of a revised, nonlinear version of the linear alignment model (Hirata & Seljak 2004) for all samples. An extra redshift dependence. (1 + z)(eta other) is constrained to.other = -0.3 +/- 0.8 (1 sigma). To obtain consistent amplitudes for all data, an additional dependence on galaxy luminosity alpha L-beta with beta = 1.1(-0.2)(+0.3) is required. The normalisation of the intrinsic alignment power spectrum is found to be (0.077 +/- 0.008)rho(-1)(cr) for galaxies at redshift 0.3 and r band magnitude of -22 (k- and evolution-corrected to z = 0).Assuming zero intrinsic alignments for blue galaxies, we assess the bias on cosmological parameters for a tomographic CFHTLSlike lensing survey given our new constraints on the intrinsic alignment model parameter space. Both the resulting mean bias and its uncertainty are smaller than the 1 sigma statistical errors when using the constraints from all samples combined. The addition of MegaZ- LRG data is critical to achieving constraints this strong, reducing the uncertainty in intrinsic alignment bias on cosmological parameters by factors of three to seven.

The Impact of Photometric Redshift Errors on Lensing Statistics in Ray-Tracing Simulations

Cosmological Studies from Tomographic Weak Lensing Peak Abundances and Impacts of Photo-z Errors

Inhomogeneous Dust Biases Photometric Redshifts and Stellar Masses for LSST

Impact of survey spatial variability on galaxy redshift distributions and the cosmological $3\times2$-point statistics for the Rubin Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST)

Impact of survey spatial variability on galaxy redshift distributions and the cosmological 3 × 2-point statistics for the Rubin Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST)

Photometric redshifts and intrinsic alignments: Degeneracies and biases in the analysis

Photometric redshifts and intrinsic alignments: degeneracies and biases in 3$\times$2pt analysis

Impact of Large-Scale Structure Systematics on Cosmological Parameter Estimation

Consequences of CCD imperfections for cosmology determined by weak lensing surveys: From laboratory measurements to cosmological parameter bias

Catastrophic Photo-Z Errors and the Dark Energy Parameter Estimates with Cosmic Shear

Tomographic cross correlations between galaxy surveys and the CMB gravitational lensing potential

Improved Weak Lensing Photometric Redshift Calibration via StratLearn and Hierarchical Modeling

Statistical Bias in the Hubble Constant and Mass Power Law Slope for Mock Strong Lenses

Galaxy-dark matter connection from weak lensing in imaging surveys: Impact of photometric redshift errors

Galaxy bias in the era of LSST: perturbative bias expansions

Cosmology with imaging galaxy surveys: the impact of evolving galaxy bias and magnification

Constraints on Intrinsic Alignment Contamination of Weak Lensing Surveys Using the MegaZ-LRG Sample

The Source-Lens Clustering Effect in the Context of Lensing Tomography and Its Self-Calibration

Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing in HSC: Validation Tests and the Impact of Heterogeneous Spectroscopic Training Sets