Cosmological Studies from Tomographic Weak Lensing Peak Abundances and Impacts of Photo-z Errors

Shuo Yuan,Chuzhong Pan,Xiangkun Liu,Qiao Wang,Zuhui Fan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab40a5
IF: 5.521
2019-01-01
The Astrophysical Journal
Abstract:Weak lensing peak abundance analyses have been applied in different surveys and demonstrated to be a powerful statistic in extracting cosmological information complementary to cosmic shear two-point correlation studies. Future large surveys with high number densities of galaxies will enable tomographic peak analyses. Focusing on high peaks, we investigate quantitatively how the tomographic redshift binning can enhance the cosmological gains. We also perform detailed studies about the degradation of cosmological information due to photometric redshift (photo-z) errors. We show that for surveys with a number density of galaxies of similar to 40 arcmin(-2), a median redshift of similar to 1, and a survey area of similar to 15,000 deg(2), the four-bin tomographic peak analyses can reduce the error contours of (Omega m, sigma(8)) by a factor of 5 compared to 2D peak analyses in the ideal case of the photo-z error being absent. More redshift bins can hardly lead to significantly better constraints. The photo-z error model here is parameterized by z(bias) and sigma(ph) and the fiducial values of z(bias) = 0.003 and sigma(ph) = 0.02 are taken. We find that using tomographic peak analyses can constrain the photo-z errors simultaneously with cosmological parameters. For four-bin analyses, we can obtain sigma(z(bias))/z(bias) similar to 10% and sigma(sigma(ph))/sigma(ph) similar to 5% without assuming priors on them. Accordingly, the cosmological constraints on Omega(m) and sigma(8) degrade by factors of similar to 2.2 and similar to 1.8, respectively, with respect to zero uncertainties on photo-z parameters. We find that the uncertainty of z(bias) plays a more significant role in degrading the cosmological constraints than that of sigma(ph).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?