Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing in HSC: Validation Tests and the Impact of Heterogeneous Spectroscopic Training Sets

Joshua S Speagle,Alexie Leauthaud,Song Huang,Christopher P Bradshaw,Felipe Ardila,Peter L Capak,Daniel J Eisenstein,Daniel C Masters,Rachel Mandelbaum,Surhud More,Melanie Simet,Cristóbal Sifón
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2968
IF: 4.8
2019-01-01
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Abstract:Although photometric redshifts (photo-z's) are crucial ingredients for current and upcoming large-scale surveys, the high-quality spectroscopic redshifts currently available to train, validate, and test them are substantially non-representative in both magnitude and colour. We investigate the nature and structure of this bias by tracking how objects from a heterogeneous training sample contribute to photo-z predictions as a function of magnitude and colour, and illustrate that the underlying redshift distribution at fixed colour can evolve strongly as a function of magnitude. We then test the robustness of the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal in 120 deg(2) of HSC-SSP DR1 data to spectroscopic completeness and photo-z biases, and find that their impacts are sub-dominant to current statistical uncertainties. Our methodology provides a framework to investigate how spectroscopic incompleteness can impact photo-z-based weak lensing predictions in future surveys such as LSST and WFIRST.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?