Abstract:Purpose: Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is used increasingly for clinical research where oblique image acquisition is commonplace, but its effects on QSM accuracy are not well understood. Theory and methods: The QSM processing pipeline involves defining the unit magnetic dipole kernel, which requires knowledge of the direction of the main magnetic field B ^ 0 $$ {\hat{\boldsymbol{B}}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ with respect to the acquired image volume axes. The direction of B ^ 0 $$ {\hat{\boldsymbol{B}}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ is dependent on the axis and angle of rotation in oblique acquisition. Using both a numerical brain phantom and in vivo acquisitions in 5 healthy volunteers, we analyzed the effects of oblique acquisition on magnetic susceptibility maps. We compared three tilt-correction schemes at each step in the QSM pipeline: phase unwrapping, background field removal and susceptibility calculation, using the RMS error and QSM-tuned structural similarity index. Results: Rotation of wrapped phase images gave severe artifacts. Background field removal with projection onto dipole fields gave the most accurate susceptibilities when the field map was first rotated into alignment with B ^ 0 $$ {\hat{\boldsymbol{B}}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ . Laplacian boundary value and variable-kernel sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data background field removal methods gave accurate results without tilt correction. For susceptibility calculation, thresholded k-space division, iterative Tikhonov regularization, and weighted linear total variation regularization, all performed most accurately when local field maps were rotated into alignment with B ^ 0 $$ {\hat{\boldsymbol{B}}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ before susceptibility calculation. Conclusion: For accurate QSM, oblique acquisition must be taken into account. Rotation of images into alignment with B ^ 0 $$ {\hat{\boldsymbol{B}}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ should be carried out after phase unwrapping and before background-field removal. We provide open-source tilt-correction code to incorporate easily into existing pipelines: https://github.com/o-snow/QSM_TiltCorrection.git.

Dipole Incompatibility Related Artifacts in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

Nonlinear Formulation of the Magnetic Field to Source Relationship for Robust Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

Clinical Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM): Biometal Imaging and Its Emerging Roles in Patient Care

A method for estimating and removing streaking artifacts in quantitative susceptibility mapping

Abstract WP292: Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Reliably Measuring Hematoma Volume in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Streaking Artifact Reduction for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping of Sources with Large Dynamic Range

Learn Less, Infer More: Learning in the Fourier Domain for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.

Whole Brain Susceptibility Mapping Using Harmonic Incompatibility Removal.

MoG-QSM: Model-based Generative Adversarial Deep Learning Network for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.

Investigating the effect of oblique image acquisition on the accuracy of QSM and a robust tilt correction method

Technical Note: Optimization of quantitative susceptibility mapping by streaking artifact detection

[Research Progress of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping in MRI].

Simultaneous Phase Unwrapping and Removal of Chemical Shift (spurs) Using Graph Cuts: Application in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

Quantitative susceptibility mapping: Report from the 2016 reconstruction challenge

Edge Prior Guided Dictionary Learning for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Reconstruction.

Single‐step Calculation of Susceptibility Through Multiple Orientation Sampling

Brief overview of principles and methods of quantitative susceptibility mapping

Model-Based Learning for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.

MoDL-QSM: Model-based Deep Learning for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

APART-QSM: an improved sub-voxel quantitative susceptibility mapping for susceptibility source separation using an iterative data fitting method

Automated Adaptive Preconditioner for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping