Abstract:Purpose: Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is used increasingly for clinical research where oblique image acquisition is commonplace, but its effects on QSM accuracy are not well understood. Theory and methods: The QSM processing pipeline involves defining the unit magnetic dipole kernel, which requires knowledge of the direction of the main magnetic field B ^ 0 $$ {\hat{\boldsymbol{B}}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ with respect to the acquired image volume axes. The direction of B ^ 0 $$ {\hat{\boldsymbol{B}}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ is dependent on the axis and angle of rotation in oblique acquisition. Using both a numerical brain phantom and in vivo acquisitions in 5 healthy volunteers, we analyzed the effects of oblique acquisition on magnetic susceptibility maps. We compared three tilt-correction schemes at each step in the QSM pipeline: phase unwrapping, background field removal and susceptibility calculation, using the RMS error and QSM-tuned structural similarity index. Results: Rotation of wrapped phase images gave severe artifacts. Background field removal with projection onto dipole fields gave the most accurate susceptibilities when the field map was first rotated into alignment with B ^ 0 $$ {\hat{\boldsymbol{B}}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ . Laplacian boundary value and variable-kernel sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data background field removal methods gave accurate results without tilt correction. For susceptibility calculation, thresholded k-space division, iterative Tikhonov regularization, and weighted linear total variation regularization, all performed most accurately when local field maps were rotated into alignment with B ^ 0 $$ {\hat{\boldsymbol{B}}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ before susceptibility calculation. Conclusion: For accurate QSM, oblique acquisition must be taken into account. Rotation of images into alignment with B ^ 0 $$ {\hat{\boldsymbol{B}}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ should be carried out after phase unwrapping and before background-field removal. We provide open-source tilt-correction code to incorporate easily into existing pipelines: https://github.com/o-snow/QSM_TiltCorrection.git.

Nonlinear Formulation of the Magnetic Field to Source Relationship for Robust Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

Clinical Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM): Biometal Imaging and Its Emerging Roles in Patient Care

MoG-QSM: Model-based Generative Adversarial Deep Learning Network for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.

Abstract WP292: Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Reliably Measuring Hematoma Volume in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Cerebral Microbleeds: Burden Assessment by Using Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

[Research Progress of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping in MRI].

Whole Brain Susceptibility Mapping Using Harmonic Incompatibility Removal.

Brief overview of principles and methods of quantitative susceptibility mapping

A method for estimating and removing streaking artifacts in quantitative susceptibility mapping

APART-QSM: an improved sub-voxel quantitative susceptibility mapping for susceptibility source separation using an iterative data fitting method

Dipole Incompatibility Related Artifacts in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

MRI Tissue Magnetism Quantification through Total Field Inversion with Deep Neural Networks

Model-Based Learning for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.

MoDL-QSM: Model-based Deep Learning for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

Learn Less, Infer More: Learning in the Fourier Domain for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.

Quantitative susceptibility mapping: Report from the 2016 reconstruction challenge

Investigating the effect of oblique image acquisition on the accuracy of QSM and a robust tilt correction method

Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: Translating an Investigative Research Tool into High Volume Clinical Diagnostic Imaging

Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping of Human Brain Reflects Spatial Variation in Tissue Composition

Learning-based single-step quantitative susceptibility mapping reconstruction without brain extraction

Deep Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Background Field Removal and Total Field Inversion