Abstract:Purpose: Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is used increasingly for clinical research where oblique image acquisition is commonplace, but its effects on QSM accuracy are not well understood. Theory and methods: The QSM processing pipeline involves defining the unit magnetic dipole kernel, which requires knowledge of the direction of the main magnetic field B ^ 0 $$ {\hat{\boldsymbol{B}}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ with respect to the acquired image volume axes. The direction of B ^ 0 $$ {\hat{\boldsymbol{B}}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ is dependent on the axis and angle of rotation in oblique acquisition. Using both a numerical brain phantom and in vivo acquisitions in 5 healthy volunteers, we analyzed the effects of oblique acquisition on magnetic susceptibility maps. We compared three tilt-correction schemes at each step in the QSM pipeline: phase unwrapping, background field removal and susceptibility calculation, using the RMS error and QSM-tuned structural similarity index. Results: Rotation of wrapped phase images gave severe artifacts. Background field removal with projection onto dipole fields gave the most accurate susceptibilities when the field map was first rotated into alignment with B ^ 0 $$ {\hat{\boldsymbol{B}}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ . Laplacian boundary value and variable-kernel sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data background field removal methods gave accurate results without tilt correction. For susceptibility calculation, thresholded k-space division, iterative Tikhonov regularization, and weighted linear total variation regularization, all performed most accurately when local field maps were rotated into alignment with B ^ 0 $$ {\hat{\boldsymbol{B}}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ before susceptibility calculation. Conclusion: For accurate QSM, oblique acquisition must be taken into account. Rotation of images into alignment with B ^ 0 $$ {\hat{\boldsymbol{B}}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ should be carried out after phase unwrapping and before background-field removal. We provide open-source tilt-correction code to incorporate easily into existing pipelines: https://github.com/o-snow/QSM_TiltCorrection.git.

Whole Brain Susceptibility Mapping Using Harmonic Incompatibility Removal.

Nonlinear Formulation of the Magnetic Field to Source Relationship for Robust Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

MoDL-QSM: Model-based Deep Learning for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

Clinical Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM): Biometal Imaging and Its Emerging Roles in Patient Care

MoG-QSM: Model-based Generative Adversarial Deep Learning Network for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.

Improved Harmonic Incompatibility Removal for Susceptibility Mapping Via Reduction of Basis Mismatch

APART-QSM: an improved sub-voxel quantitative susceptibility mapping for susceptibility source separation using an iterative data fitting method

Abstract WP292: Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Reliably Measuring Hematoma Volume in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Harmonic Field Extension for QSM with Reduced Spatial Coverage using Physics-informed Generative Adversarial Network

Dipole Incompatibility Related Artifacts in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

Three-dimensional Simultaneous Brain Mapping of T1, T2, T2*and Magnetic Susceptibility with MR Multitasking

Deep Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Background Field Removal and Total Field Inversion

Spinet-QSM: model-based deep learning with schatten p-norm regularization for improved quantitative susceptibility mapping

[Research Progress of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping in MRI].

Learning-based single-step quantitative susceptibility mapping reconstruction without brain extraction

xQSM: Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping with Octave Convolutional and Noise Regularized Neural Networks

MRI Tissue Magnetism Quantification through Total Field Inversion with Deep Neural Networks

A method for estimating and removing streaking artifacts in quantitative susceptibility mapping

A spatially adaptive regularization based three-dimensional reconstruction network for quantitative susceptibility mapping

Investigating the effect of oblique image acquisition on the accuracy of QSM and a robust tilt correction method

Overview of quantitative susceptibility mapping using deep learning -- Current status, challenges and opportunities