Abstract:In the Late Qing and the Republic of China,scholars had developed different paths in transforming traditional academics and bridging Sino-Western and old-new in the context of the evolution of Classical Studies and Historiography.Two distinct schools of Confucianism came into being in the Republic of China: one was the historical ″Guwen″ represented by Zhang Taiyan and his students,the other was the philosophic Jinwen represented by Liaoping and his students.With the aggravation of the National Calamity in the 1930s and revival of Confucianism,it was a common practice to promote Chinese culture and national spirits.Thus the transformation and practice of Confucianism became the focus in the discussion between the two different schools.During the dispute Meng Wentong and Li Yuancheng,Liao Ping's students,argued with Zhang Taiyan and Huang Kan constantly about sinology and Neo-Confucianism,″Jinwen″ and ″Guwen,″ and ″Classical Studies″ and ″Historiography″ to clarify the origin and development of Confucian philosophy. After a careful study of Qing's academic history and looking into the relations between Dai Zhen's philosophy and Xun Zi,Zhang Taiyan emphasized the unique significance of Dai Zhen in Qing's Academic history.On the contrary,Meng Wentong and Li Yuancheng resorted to traditional sinology and Confucian theories to question the construction of Dai Zhen's theory.Based on the examination of Examine Goodness,Li Yuancheng criticized Dai Zhen's doctrine of Ethics,Desire and Goodness as a misunderstanding of Mencius.Based on Guwen and centreing around the separation of Confucianism and Buddhism,Zhang Taiyan stressed the reliability of the historical account of the Six Classics to respond to the Skeptical School and illustrated the ideological and cultural tradition of China in the past two thousand years.Li Yuancheng had developed Liao Ping's theory and discussed with Zhang Taiyan the Rites and Spring and Autumn aiming to link ″Jinwen″ and ″Guwen″ and to reiterate the Great Righteousness of Spring and Autumn.Meng Wentong,through his study of the development of Confucian philosophy in Zhou dynasty,Qin dynasty and the two Han dynasties,attempted to find the succession of Confucianism and Mencius's thoughts,to analyze the philosophy of ″humanity and destiny,″ to interpret the controversies over Mencius and Xun Zi,to clarify the origin of sinology,and to challenge Cheng Zhu Confucian Orthodoxy.In short,Liao Ping's students had constructed a Confucian system based on the ″Goodness″ of Mencius,theoretically paving the way for for Jinwen and Confucian historiography. The school of Zhang Taiyan-Huang Kan purported to explore the development of national cultures,focused on the language and history,and advocated the cultivation of mind and behavior.Thus,it had associated moral ethics with political and social pragmaticism and had started the practical academics of Classical Studies and Historiography.In contrast,Liao Ping's students emphasized on constructing an dynamic interaction between the meanings of Classics,institution,and historical facts,carrying forward the ″New Confucianism of Qin and Han,″ and elucidating the revolutionary spirit of Jinwen and system design.Dispute of ″Jinwen″ and ″Guwen″ manifested the core difference of the academic interests between the schools of Zhang Taiyan-Huang Kan and Liao Ping's students.A clarification of their differences and disputes is of importance in interpreting the diversification of modern Confucianism and providing intellectual resources for the building of a nation-state or a civilization-state.

The Reform of Zhang Juzheng,the Reform in the Longwan Period or the Reform in the Jialongwan Period?——Distinguishing the Name of the Reform Movement in the Middle of Ming Dynasty

“张居正改革”、“隆万改革”,还是“嘉隆万改革”——明朝中期改革运动称谓的界定

Dispute of ″Jinwen″ and ″Guwen″ and Orientation of Confucianism under the Background of ″National Calamity″

The characteristics of flexibility,phase and consistence of reforming Chinese rural land system

Imperial Examination Reforms in the Qianlong Era of the Qing Dynasty:Motivation,Measures and Impact

Xing Yunlu and the Calendar Reform in the Late Ming Dynasty

Reform of the Traditional Historiography and Compilation of the New History:the Purport of A History of Chinese Historiography by Jin Yufu

The Reform of Reducing the Redundant Officials of Zhang Juzheng and the Causes of His Failure

On the Political Reform of the Ming Dynasty from the Reign of Jiajing to the Reign of Wanli

Principles and control planning of Three-old Lands Reform of Guangdong Province

The Controversy of the Reform and Choice of the Reform

A Myth:Zhang Ju-zheng’s Reform

A Review of the Rural Scholars' Viewpoints of the Education Reform in Late Qing Dynasty on the Basis of Liu Dapeng's Diary and Zhu Zhisan's Diary

Zhang Juzheng's Tax Law Reform

Another Interpretation of Abolishing Imperial Examination and Initiating Schools in the Late Qing Dynasty—— Reading Notes on Zhu Shisan's Diary(1893-1919)

Gaogong's Official Administration Reform and the effectiveness

The Movement to Renew Historiography in Middle-Tang Dynasty

The Development of Rural Grassroots Cells in the South of the Yangtze River at the Beginning of Ming Dynasty

Further Discussion on the Ratio of Political Forces of the Reform in 1895-1898

How to Treat the Different Voices in the Reform Rightly

The Contrast Between Regionalism And New Regionalism And Its Inspiration To The "Province Administrating Counties Directly" Reform