Abstract:Objective::To compare the accuracy of total keratometry (TK) and conventional keratometry (K) for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation based on the new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometry.Methods::This was a prospective self controlled study, 29 patients (58 eyes) with binocular age-related cataract were enrolled for the phacoemulsification combined with diffractive trifocal IOL implantation during May 2021 and November 2021 in Peking University People's Hospital. Eyes were assessed using a swept-source optical biometer (IOLMaster 700). Axial length, anterior chamber depth, central corneal thickness, lens thickness, posterior keratometry, TK, and white-to-white corneal diameter were recorded. Emmetropic IOL power was calculated using K and TK in the current standard formulas (SRK/T, Haigis, Holladay2, and Barrett Universal II) and a new formula developed for TK (Barrett TK Universal II). Selected IOL power and predicted refractive outcomes were recorded. Corrected distance visual acuity and postoperative manifest refraction were measured 1 month and 3 months postoperatively. The absolute prediction error, mean absolute error, median absolute error (MedAE), and the percentages of eyes within prediction errors of ±0.25 D, ±0.50 D, ±0.75 D, and ±1.00 D were calculated for all IOL formulas. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and McNemar's tests were used to analyze the difference.Results::There was strong agreement between K and TK (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.996), with a mean difference of 0.007 D. A relatively lower MedAE values were observed for Haigis and Barrett Universal Ⅱ for TK when compared with K. MedAE from TK was a trend toward larger than that from K in SRK/T and Holladay2 formulas. A relatively greater proportion of eyes fell within ±0.25 D and ±0.50 D of the predicted postoperative spherical equivalent range in the TK group than in the K group for Barrett Universal Ⅱformula. Proportion of eyes within ±0.25 D and ±0.50 D of predicted refraction were slightly higher in the K group for SRK/T, Haigis and Holladay2. However, differences in MedAEs, and percentages of eyes within the above prediction errors were not statistically significant.Conclusions::Conventional K and TK for IOL calculation showed strong agreement for refractive prediction for IOL power calculation based on IOLMaster 700, and with a trend toward better refractive outcomes using TK for Barrett Universal Ⅱformula.

Comparison of Pre- and Post-DMEK Keratometry and Total Keratometry Values for IOL Power Calculations in Eyes Undergoing Triple DMEK

Keratometric Measurements and IOL Calculations in Pseudophakic Post-Dsaek Patients

Comparison of the Accuracy of Total Keratometry and Conventional Keratometry for IOL Power Calculation Based on the New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometry

Refractive change and stability after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Effect of corneal dehydration-induced hyperopic shift on intraocular lens power calculation

Using the posterior to anterior corneal curvature radii ratio to minimize the risk of a postoperative hyperopic shift after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

Comparative analysis of corneal parameters between DMEK and UT‐DSAEK eyes in 3‐year follow‐up

Total and simulated keratometry measurements using IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam AXL after small incision lenticule extraction

Comparison of intraocular lens power prediction by American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery formulas and Barrett True-K TK in eyes with prior laser refractive surgery

Comparison of Corneal Power and Astigmatism Between Simulated Keratometry, True Net Power, and Total Corneal Refractive Power Before and after SMILE Surgery

Accuracy of toric intraocular lens power calculation depending on different keratometry values using a novel network based software platform

Fellow eye data for intraocular lens calculation in eyes undergoing combined phacovitrectomy

Determining corneal power using Orbscan II videokeratography for intraocular lens calculation after excimer laser surgery for myopia

Comparison of keratometry using SS-OCT and dual Scheimpflug-Placido imaging in postmyopic corneal refractive surgery eyes

Comparison of intraocular lens power prediction accuracy of formulas in American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery post-refractive surgery calculator in eyes with prior radial keratotomy

Comparing Standard Keratometry and Total Keratometry Before and After Myopic Corneal Refractive Surgery With a Swept-Source OCT Biometer

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with presbyopia-correcting and toric intraocular lenses - a narrative review

Comparison of toric intraocular lens calculation with the integrated K method and three single biometric devices

A UK Tertiary Eye Care Referral Centre Experience

Differences Between Simulated Keratometry and Total Corneal Power in Eyes With Keratoconus and a Formula to Improve IOL Power Calculation Results

Intraocular lens power calculation accuracy in patients with keratoconus: Network meta‐analysis and systematic review

Accuracy of recent intraocular lens power calculation methods in post-myopic LASIK eyes