Abstract:Objective::To compare the accuracy of total keratometry (TK) and conventional keratometry (K) for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation based on the new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometry.Methods::This was a prospective self controlled study, 29 patients (58 eyes) with binocular age-related cataract were enrolled for the phacoemulsification combined with diffractive trifocal IOL implantation during May 2021 and November 2021 in Peking University People's Hospital. Eyes were assessed using a swept-source optical biometer (IOLMaster 700). Axial length, anterior chamber depth, central corneal thickness, lens thickness, posterior keratometry, TK, and white-to-white corneal diameter were recorded. Emmetropic IOL power was calculated using K and TK in the current standard formulas (SRK/T, Haigis, Holladay2, and Barrett Universal II) and a new formula developed for TK (Barrett TK Universal II). Selected IOL power and predicted refractive outcomes were recorded. Corrected distance visual acuity and postoperative manifest refraction were measured 1 month and 3 months postoperatively. The absolute prediction error, mean absolute error, median absolute error (MedAE), and the percentages of eyes within prediction errors of ±0.25 D, ±0.50 D, ±0.75 D, and ±1.00 D were calculated for all IOL formulas. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and McNemar's tests were used to analyze the difference.Results::There was strong agreement between K and TK (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.996), with a mean difference of 0.007 D. A relatively lower MedAE values were observed for Haigis and Barrett Universal Ⅱ for TK when compared with K. MedAE from TK was a trend toward larger than that from K in SRK/T and Holladay2 formulas. A relatively greater proportion of eyes fell within ±0.25 D and ±0.50 D of the predicted postoperative spherical equivalent range in the TK group than in the K group for Barrett Universal Ⅱformula. Proportion of eyes within ±0.25 D and ±0.50 D of predicted refraction were slightly higher in the K group for SRK/T, Haigis and Holladay2. However, differences in MedAEs, and percentages of eyes within the above prediction errors were not statistically significant.Conclusions::Conventional K and TK for IOL calculation showed strong agreement for refractive prediction for IOL power calculation based on IOLMaster 700, and with a trend toward better refractive outcomes using TK for Barrett Universal Ⅱformula.

Comparison of the Accuracy of Total Keratometry and Conventional Keratometry for IOL Power Calculation Based on the New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometry

Comparing Standard Keratometry and Total Keratometry Before and After Myopic Corneal Refractive Surgery With a Swept-Source OCT Biometer

Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas based on swept-source OCT biometer in cataract patients with phakic intraocular lens

Comparison of intraocular lens power prediction by American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery formulas and Barrett True-K TK in eyes with prior laser refractive surgery

Total keratometry for toric intraocular lens calculation: comparison from two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers

Accuracy of recent intraocular lens power calculation methods in post-myopic LASIK eyes

Comparison of Two Optical Biometers in Intraocular Lens Power Calculation

Comparison of Barrett TK Universal II and Barrett Universal II TCRP Formulas in Power Calculations for 3 Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses

Comparative Clinical Accuracy Analysis of the Newly Developed ZZ IOL and Four Existing IOL Formulas for Post-Corneal Refractive Surgery Eyes.

Accuracy of toric intraocular lens power calculation depending on different keratometry values using a novel network based software platform

Accuracy of swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometry for intraocular lens power calculation: a retrospective cross–sectional study

Accuracy of refractive outcomes using standard or total keratometry for intraocular lens power formulas in conventional cataract surgery

Prediction accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation methods after laser refractive surgery

Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using three optical biometry measurement devices: the OA-2000, Lenstar-LS900 and IOLMaster-500

Differences Between Simulated Keratometry and Total Corneal Power in Eyes With Keratoconus and a Formula to Improve IOL Power Calculation Results

Comparison of intraocular lens power prediction accuracy of formulas in American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery post-refractive surgery calculator in eyes with prior radial keratotomy

Accuracy of new intraocular lens calculation formulas in Chinese eyes with short axial lengths

Comparison of accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 29.0 mm

Error Sources and Correction of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation after Corneal Refractive Surgery

[Clinical Study of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Methods after Cornea Refractive Surgery].

Agreement between swept-source optical biometry and Scheimpflug-based tomography in eyes with previous myopic refractive surgery