Structural changes ofNoetia ponderosa red blood cell membranes during cell volume regulation in reduced salinities: A freeze fracture study

L. M. Amende,S. Pierce

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00691564

1980-12-01

Journal of Comparative Physiology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lenses in Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy Patients: Results from Triple Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Procedure

Rita Mencucci,Giovanni Romualdi,Chiara De Vitto,Michela Cennamo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/life14020243

2024-02-10

Life

Abstract:Purpose: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is currently regarded as the most effective surgical procedure for addressing Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (FECD), frequently performed in conjunction with cataract surgery. In this retrospective study, we present a comparison of visual performance, clinical outcomes, and optical quality between two types of monofocal Intraocular Lenses (IOLs): one standard and one enhanced intermediate vision model, implanted in patients who underwent combined phacoemulsification and DMEK surgery. Methods: This single center comparative retrospective study was conducted at the Eye Clinic of the University of Florence (Italy) and included a total of 48 eyes of 48 patients affected by FECD and cataract. All patients underwent combined DMEK with phacoemulsification procedures. The patients' data were analyzed and divided into two groups: one group (standard group) consisted of 24 eyes that underwent phaco-DMEK with implantation of a monofocal IOL, and the second group (enhanced monofocal group) included 24 eyes that underwent phaco-DMEK with implantation of an enhanced monofocal IOL. In both groups, the following monocular visual outcomes were evaluated 6 months after surgery: Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA) and Best-Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) at 4 mts; Uncorrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (UIVA), Distance-Corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (DCIVA) at 66 cm; Uncorrected Near Visual Acuity (UNVA) and Best Corrected Near Visual Acuity (BCNVA). Monocular defocus curves were also assessed. Furthermore, optical quality in terms of Contrast Sensitivity (CS) in photopic conditions, Higher-Order Aberrations (HOAs) at a pupil size of 5 mm. Modulation Transfer Function (MTF), Objective Scatter Index (OSI), and Strehl ratio, were also analyzed. A Patient-Reported Spectacle Independence Questionnaire was revised to evaluate spectacle independence outcomes. Results: the two groups did not exhibit statistically significant differences in terms of UDVA, BCDVA, UNVA and BCNVA, photopic CS, HOAs, OSI, Strehl ratio, and MTF. However, in the phaco-DMEK enhanced monofocal IOL group, significantly better results were observed in terms of UIVA and DCIVA as well as a different defocus curve profile at 1.50 D, providing better defocus results at intermediate distance compared with the ZCB00 IOL. Conclusion: In our study, we found that enhanced monofocal lens performed favorable visual outcomes, even in cases of FECD, compared to standard monofocal IOLs. Comparable optical quality observed in the Eyhance group could allow surgeons to consider these lenses as a viable option for selected patients with FECD.

biology
Combined or sequential DMEK in cases of cataract and Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy-A systematic review and meta-analysis

Vito Romano,Maria Laura Passaro,Bjoern Bachmann,Lamis Baydoun,Sorcha Ni Dhubhghaill,Mor Dickman,Hannah J Levis,Mohit Parekh,Marina Rodriguez-Calvo-De-Mora,Ciro Costagliola,Gianni Virgili,Francesco Semeraro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.15691

Abstract:To compare the outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) performed after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation (sequential DMEK) and DMEK combined with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation (combined DMEK) in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and cataract. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis performed according to the PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. Literature searches were conducted in Medline and Scopus. Comparative studies reporting sequential DMEK and combined DMEK in FECD patients were included. The main outcome measure of the study was the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) improvement. Secondary outcomes were postoperative endothelial cell density (ECD), rebubbling rate and primary graft failure rate. Bias risk was assessed and a quality appraisal of the body of evidence was completed using the Cochrane Robin-I tool. A total of 667 eyes (5 studies) were included in this review, 292 eyes (43.77%) underwent a combined DMEK, while 375 (56.22%) eyes underwent a sequential DMEK surgery. We found no evidence of a difference between the two groups (mean difference, 95% CI) regarding: (1) CDVA improvement (-0.06; -0.14, 0.03 LogMAR; 3 studies, I2 : 0%; p = 0.86); (2) postoperative ECD (-62; -190, 67 cells/mm2 ; 4 studies, I2 : 67%; p = 0.35); (3) rebubbling (risks ratio: 1.04; 0.59, 1.85; 4 studies, I2 : 48%; p = 0.89); and primary graft failure rate (risks ratio: 0.91; 0.32, 2.57; 3 studies, I2 : 0%; p = 0.86). Of all the 5 non-randomized studies, all (100%) were graded as low quality. The overall quality of the analysed studies was low. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm no difference or superiority of one approach in terms of CDVA, endothelial cell count and postoperative complication rate between the two arms.
[Outcomes of hemi-Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and phacoemulsification for the treatment of primary Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy combined with cataract]

B E Malyugin,A M Geliastanov,O P Antonova,E A Andreeva,M V Poletaeva,R S Isabekov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202414001136

Abstract:Purpose: This study evaluates the long-term results of surgical treatment of patients with Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy and cataract. Material and methods: The study included 24 patients (24 eyes) with primary Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy and cataract, who underwent cataract phacoemulsification with IOL implantation and of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty with a semicircular graft (hemi-DMEK). The effect of treatment was assessed by best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT) and endothelial cell density (ECD). Results: In total, surgical treatment involved 14 donor corneas that were divided in half during the preparation and isolation of the Descemet's membrane (DM). By month 12 after the surgery an increase in visual functions and graft transparency were observed in 23 patients (23 eyes) out of 24. Repeated keratoplasty was required in one case due to fibrosis of the posterior layers of recipient's corneal stroma. At 12 months postoperatively, the study group showed an increase in BCVA from 0.16±0.1 to 0.75±20, a decrease in CCT from 650.9±4.5 μm to 519.6±43.9, and a decreased in ECD from 2850.5±84.7 cells/mm2 up to 1285.5±277.2 cells/mm2. Thus, the loss of endothelial cells at one year after surgery amounted to 54.9%. Conclusions: The developed method for transplantation of a semicircular DM fragment provides a tissue-saving approach to endothelial keratoplasty, and considering the high percentage of transparent engraftment of grafts and complete visual rehabilitation, it can be recommended in the treatment of patients with cataract and Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy.
Effect of Simultaneous Endothelial Keratoplasty and Cataract Surgery: A Secondary Analysis of the Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial

Winston Chamberlain,Charles C Lin,Jia Yue,Victoria Cavallino,Beth Ann Benetz,Jonathan H Lass,Benjamin Arnold,Thomas M Lietman,Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003306

IF: 3.152

2024-01-01

Cornea

Abstract:Purpose: Combining cataract surgery with endothelial keratoplasty (triple EK) is a common practice and may be safer because it commits the patient to only one surgery. This study aimed to determine whether outcomes of pseudophakic endothelial keratoplasty and triple EK have similar outcomes. Methods: This was a non-prespecified secondary analysis of a multicenter, double-masked, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Enrollment centers included the Casey Eye Institute at Oregon Health and Sciences University and the Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University. Patients with damaged or diseased endothelium and were considered good candidates for either Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty or ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty were randomized to one of the two surgeries 1-2 days prior to surgery. If the patient had a cataract, they underwent simultaneous cataract surgery. The primary outcome was visual acuity at 6 months. Visual acuity at 3, 12, and 24 months, 3, 6, 12, and 24 month endothelial cell density and intraoperative and postoperative complications were also recorded. Results: Those who had pseudophakic EK generally were older, more likely to be male, and more likely to have worse baseline vision with higher corneal densitometry values. After controlling for baseline visual acuity and type of keratoplasty, those that underwent Triple-EK had 0.09 better LogMAR lines better visual acuity at 6 (95% CI -0.17 to -0.10; P = 0.02) and 12 months (95% CI -0.21 to -0.07; P = 0.03). Although those receiving Triple- EK had nearly one-half LogMAR line better visual acuity at 24 months, it was no longer statistically significant (95% CI -0.20 to -0.05; P = 0.36). There was no statistically significant difference in ECD between groups at any timepoint. Those undergoing triple EK were more likely to have at least one adverse event (P = 0.02). Conclusions: Earlier intervention with Triple-EK may improve visual acuity outcomes after endothelial keratoplasty compared with staged procedures, but may also increase the risks of adverse events including the need for re-bubble.
Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Endothelial Failure in Primary Angle Closure Suspects

Eva Roy-Chowdhury,Maximilian P. M. Angerer,Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt,Theofilos Tourtas,Friedrich E. Kruse,Julia M. Weller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000003603

IF: 3.152

2024-06-25

Cornea

Abstract:Purpose: To analyze the feasibility and outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for treatment of endothelial failure in primary angle closure suspect (PACS) eyes. Methods: Retrospective, single-center case series of eyes treated by DMEK for endothelial failure caused by PACS. Main study parameters were success rate of DMEK, best-corrected visual acuity, anterior chamber depth, central corneal thickness, and endothelial cell density. Mean follow-up time was 16 ± 13 months. Results: Ten eyes of 9 patients receiving DMEK for the treatment of corneal endothelial failure because of PACS were included. Except for 2 eyes that had undergone cataract surgery, none of the eyes had previous ocular surgery. DMEK combined with cataract surgery was performed in 5 eyes, DMEK alone with second-step cataract surgery in 2 eyes. The eyes with corneal edema after cataract surgery received DMEK only. DMEK surgery was successful in nine out of 10 eyes, 1 patient required repeat DMEK because of primary graft failure. In the group of phakic eyes, mean preoperative internal anterior chamber depth was 1.74 ± 0.18 mm. In eyes with corneal edema, central corneal thickness was 849 ± 205 μm before DMEK surgery, and 517 ± 24 μm at the final postoperative visit ( P = 0.002). Conclusions: DMEK is a feasible option in eyes with endothelial failure because of primary angle closure. In case of advanced corneal edema, a second-step procedure (first DMEK, second cataract surgery) is a possible approach if visibility of the lens is too poor for simultaneous cataract surgery.

ophthalmology
Endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with a retained angle-supported intraocular lens

Konstantinos Droutsas,Apostolos Lazaridis,George Kymionis,Klio Chatzistefanou,Dimitris Papaconstantinou,Walter Sekundo,Chryssanthi Koutsandrea

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-0899-x

IF: 2.029

2018-04-04

International Ophthalmology

Abstract:PurposeTo describe the outcomes of endothelial keratoplasty (EK) for bullous keratopathy in eyes with a retained angle-supported anterior chamber intraocular lens (acIOL).MethodsAmong 263 consecutive EK procedures, 7 DMEK and 11 DSAEK procedures were identified in eyes with an acIOL and included in the present retrospective case series. Pre- and postoperative status including ocular history, anatomical outcome and complications as well as best-corrected visual acuity was evaluated.ResultsOcular history included complicated cataract surgery (n = 11), ocular trauma (n = 4) and primary intracapsular cataract extraction (n = 3). Surgery-related complications included primary graft failure (n = 1), graft detachment (n = 1), endophthalmitis (n = 1) and allograft rejection (n = 1). A clear cornea at the final examination (14 ± 4 months) was observed in 14/18 (78%), while the visual outcome was limited due to significant ocular comorbidity in 9 out of 14 uncomplicated procedures.ConclusionThe presented short-term outcomes suggest that both DMEK and DSAEK are feasible in eyes with an angle-supported acIOL yielding an acceptable graft survival rate in the first postoperative year.
A measure of moral values.

R. Hogan,E. Dickstein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/H0033389

1972-10-01

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract:
[The Effect of Descemet-Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined with Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery or Lens Exchange].

Jing Hong,Yan-Sheng Hao,Zhi-Zhong Ma,Rong-Mei Peng,Hong-Qiang Qu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2011.01.005

2011-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the effect and explore the complications of Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) combined with phacoemulsification cataract surgery or lens exchange in corneal endothelial dysfunction eyes with lens disorders.METHODS:Retrospective case series. Eighteen consecutive cases (20 eyes) were performed DSAEK combined with lens surgery from December 2007 to December 2008 in Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital. Five cases (7 eyes) were performed DSAEK combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) insertion. Seven cases were combined with anterior chamber IOL extraction, anterior vitrectomy and posterior chamber IOL insertion. Six aphakia cases were performed with DSAEK combined with anterior vitrectomy and sclera fixation posterior chamber IOL insertion. Postoperatively, the visual acuity, corneal transparency, central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell density (ECD) and complications were observed during the follow-up.RESULTS:The irritation was disappeared in all of patients. All of the corneas became transparent. The preoperative and postoperative mean CCT of the recipient beds was 859 µm and 553 µm respectively. T value was 5.303 (t = 5.303, P < 0.01). It was extremely significant difference. The mean ECD of the donors was 2987 cells/mm(2). The ECD was 1803 cells/mm(2) in three months postoperatively. The rate of endothelial cells loss was 41%. The visual acuity improved significantly except 9 eyes which had fundus disorders. Six eyes were better than 0.8. It was 55% in normal retinal function patients (6/11). The inflammatory reaction of the anterior chamber IOL eyes was most serious. Six eyes underwent graft dislocation. Five cases underwent high intraocular pressure. One case occurred graft rejection. These complications occurred in anterior chamber IOL eyes.CONCLUSIONS:DSAEK combined with phacoemulsification cataract surgery or lens exchange is a safe and effective surgical treatment for corneal endothelial dysfunction with lens disorders. More complications occur in anterior chamber IOL eyes. DSAEK should be cautiously chosen in abnormal iris and chamber angle structural eyes.
Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty as Treatment for Late-Onset Interface Fluid Syndrome After Laser In Situ Keratomileusis

Marcela Huertas-Bello,Karen Sem,Diego E. Alba,Kendall E. Donaldson,Ellen H. Koo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000003538

IF: 3.152

2024-03-13

Cornea

Abstract:Purpose: We herein present Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) as an effective surgical means of treatment for the management of interface fluid syndrome (IFS) in a series of cases with distant history of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Methods: Three cases from a single institution were included. All patients had documented IFS in the setting of history of LASIK. All 3 patients underwent DMEK for the treatment of IFS. Visual acuity, clinical findings, pachymetry, endothelial cell count, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography were recorded. Results: We describe 3 cases of late-onset IFS that developed in eyes many years after LASIK (ranging from 15 to 31 years). All 3 patients had clinically significant corneal edema and evidence of poor endothelial function at the time of IFS diagnosis. DMEK was subsequently performed in each case. All 3 eyes showed resolution of corneal edema and improvement in best-corrected visual acuity after DMEK. Conclusions: DMEK can provide successful visual and anatomical recovery in patients who have had previous LASIK and experience late-onset IFS due to endothelial cell dysfunction.

ophthalmology
Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and intraocular lens implantation in cases of aphakic bullous keratopathy

Yusuf Koçluk,Burcu Kasım

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2020.1733031

2020-01-02

Abstract:Purpose: To present the results of a modified sutured transcleral or sutureless intrascleral three-piece foldable intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in cases of aphakic bullous keratopathy (ABK) with inadequate capsular support.Methods: Twenty-one eyes of 21 patients with ABK and inadequate capsular support who underwent DMEK with three-piece foldable IOL implantation from September 2015 to June 2018 were analyzed, retrospectively. Two techniques were used in IOL implantation; sutureless intrascleral fixation of the IOL (ISF-IOL) and sutured transscleral-fixated IOL (TSF-IOL) implantation.Results: Rebubblings due to the graft detachment were needed in 9 (43%) of 21 eyes in the early postoperative period. At the last follow-up visit, 18 (85.7%) of DM grafts were attached. Any complication related to IOL implantation was not observed in the ISF-IOL cases. Exposure of the fixation suture in 1 (25%) of 4 TSF-IOL cases was seen, postoperatively. The increase in the mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the last follow-up visit was statistically significant when compared to the mean preoperative BCVA (p < .001). The mean preoperative central corneal thickness was decreased from 883.3 ± 111.8 (700-1150) μm to 582.3 ± 118.2 (490-990) μm at the last follow-up visit (p < .001).Conclusion: DMEK combined with sutureless/sutured three-piece foldable IOL implantation appears to be a feasible method for the management in ABK without adequate capsular support. A faster visual recovery can be obtained with the techniques presented.
Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Aphakic, Aniridic, and Vitrectomized Eyes: A Review

Davide Romano,Toshiki Shimizu,Akira Kobayashi,Satoru Yamagami,Vito Romano,Takahiko Hayashi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000003630

IF: 3.152

2024-07-17

Cornea

Abstract:Purpose: The aim of this review is to examine the techniques, complications, and outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in aphakic, aniridic, and vitrectomized eyes. Methods: A literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE database (via PubMed), using as keywords “(DMEK) AND (aphakia OR aniridia OR vitrectomy OR vitrectomized).” The research was limited to 10 years (January 2014–March 2024), in view of lack of literature before 2014. Articles, including case reports and case series, were included. Results: Twenty articles were included. No randomized controlled trials were found nor comparative studies with more than 1 technique used. Mean rebubbling rate in complex eyes was 29%, whereas mean endothelial cell loss at 6 months was 37%. The mean postoperative visual acuity improved from 1.47 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution to 0.7 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution. Conclusions: Despite being more challenging, compared with the techniques reported in literature, DMEK can be considered a valid option for the management of endothelial decompensation in complex eyes, with rebubbling rate and endothelial cell loss at 6 months, which are similar to non-complex eyes.

ophthalmology
Associations between cartilage oligomeric matrix protein and several articular tissues in early knee joint osteoarthritis.

J. Kumm,A. Tamm,K. Veske,M. Lintrop

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/RHEUMATOLOGY/KEL271

2006-10-01

Rheumatology

Abstract:
Double trouble in DMEK surgery: Learning experience and review of the literature

Vito Romano,Maria Laura Passaro,Matteo Airaldi,Chiara Ancona,Luca Pagano,Francesco Semeraro,Roberto Pineda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721241228346

2024-02-23

European Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract:European Journal of Ophthalmology, Ahead of Print. PurposeTo report a challenging Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) case, complicated by intraoperative aqueous misdirection and spontaneous anterior chamber fibrin reaction.MethodsA 70-year-old female affected by corneal edema due to Fuchs endothelial dystrophy underwent a triple procedure (cataract extraction - IOL implantation - DMEK surgery) in her left eye. This report illustrates the management of the intraoperative complications of aqueous misdirection syndrome and anterior chamber fibrin reaction.ResultsDespite the optimal management of the posterior pressure and the thorough removal of the fibrinous reaction during the case, the DMEK graft was not completely unfolded and centred at the end of the surgical procedure. Nonetheless, the patient showed good long-term anatomical and functional recovery: at the last follow-up (2 years after surgery), central corneal thickness was 526 μm with a best corrected visual acuity of 20/25 and an endothelial cell density of 1112 cell/mm2.ConclusionEarly recognition and prompt management of intraoperative aqueous misdirection syndrome and anterior chamber fibrin reaction during DMEK surgery is essential to ensure good functional and anatomical outcomes.

ophthalmology
Women and the use of health services.

G. Wilensky,G. G. Cafferata

1983-05-01

Abstract:
A UK Tertiary Eye Care Referral Centre Experience

Francesco Aiello,Francesco Matarazzo,Maria Phylactou,Kirithika Muthusamy,Vincenzo Maurino

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206097

IF: 3.9

2024-10-14

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract:Purpose: To compare the postoperative complications and clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in eyes with previous glaucoma filtering surgery. Methods: In this retrospective comparative case series, we analysed postoperative visual acuity and intraocular pressure, graft survival, rate of graft detachment and/or dislocation, number of rebubbling and/or graft repositioning procedures, and graft rejection or failure (primary and secondary). Results: Sixteen eyes with DMEK and 80 eyes with DSAEK with previous glaucoma surgery were studied. The results were recorded at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. No statistically significant differences in postoperative visual acuity were found between the two groups at any stage of the follow-up. Intraocular pressure was lower in the DMEK group at the follow-up stage of 3 (p = 0.0022) and 12 months (p = 0.0480). Visually significant graft detachment was recorded in 31.3% and 22.5% of DMEK and DSAEK cases, respectively (p = 0.4541). All DMEK detachments (n = 5) were managed with slit-lamp rebubbling. Out of 18 graft detachments in the DSAEK group, 2 grafts were observed due to small graft detachment, 6 large graft detachments underwent rebubbling performed in the operating theatre, and 10 eyes needed primary graft repositioning for graft dislocation. Conclusions: DMEK is a feasible option to treat endothelial failure in complex eyes with previous glaucoma surgery. In the DMEK group, visual acuity outcomes and possibly postoperative intraocular pressure control were better compared with the DSAEK group.

medicine, general & internal
Recombination activating gene 1 (Rag1) in zebrafish and shark

P. Greenhalgh,L. Steiner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188438

Immunogenetics

Abstract:
Visual Outcomes Following Non-Diffractive Extended-Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens Implantation in Patients with Epiretinal Membrane in One Eye and Bilateral Cataracts

Laura Sararols,Mercè Guarro,Meritxell Vázquez,Sergi Ruiz,Elena López,Marc Biarnés

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12112443

IF: 4.757

2024-10-25

Biomedicines

Abstract:Background/Objectives: This study aimed to characterize the visual performance in patients with bilateral cataracts and a unilateral epiretinal membrane (ERM) undergoing cataract surgery with non-diffractive extended depth of focus (EDoF) intraocular lens (IOL) placement in both eyes and phacovitrectomy in the eye with ERM. Methods: This was a prospective, descriptive, single-arm study. Visual outcomes were measured in monocular and binocular conditions in patients with bilateral cataracts and unilateral ERM stages 2 or 3 implanted with an EDoF IOL. At 6 months, visual acuity (uncorrected and corrected at different distances and contrast levels), contrast sensitivity, and visual disturbances assessed using a Light Distortion Analyzer were determined. Results: We included 22 patients (50% females, mean age of 71.4 ± 5.8 years). Mean monocular best-corrected visual acuities at 100% contrast were 0.07 ± 0.09, 0.23 ± 0.10, and 0.48 ± 0.14 logMAR for eyes with ERM, and 0.02 ± 0.08, 0.19 ± 0.11, and 0.41 ± 0.18 logMAR for fellow eyes for far, intermediate, and near distance vision, respectively. No differences were observed in visual outcomes, contrast sensitivity, or visual disturbances between ERM and non-ERM eyes, except for near distance. No unexpected adverse events were observed. Conclusions: Non-diffractive EDoF IOL can be considered in patients with cataracts and stage 2 or 3 ERM pursuing spectacle independence.

biochemistry & molecular biology,medicine, research & experimental,pharmacology & pharmacy
Simultaneous Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Corneal Endothelial Failure With Stromal Scarring

Necip Kara

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/icl.0000000000001108

2024-07-26

Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice

Abstract:We present an alternative surgical procedure including simultaneous deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in a case with endothelial failure and stromal scarring. A 62-year-old woman presented with vision loss caused by pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. While waiting for a corneal transplant, the patient developed infectious keratitis, which was treated with medication. Although the keratitis healed, it left a scar. To improve the patient's vision, a corneal transplant surgery that included simultaneous DALK and DMEK was performed. Postoperatively, the corneal graft was clear, and the Descemet membrane was well attached. However, there was an interface haze because of residual stromal tissue. The patient's best-corrected visual acuity improved from hand motion to 0.2 (decimal). This combined procedure allows for lamellar keratoplasty in cases with coexistence of corneal endothelial and stromal involvement.

ophthalmology
Hitting the refractive target in corneal endothelial transplantation triple procedures: A systematic review

Rosa Giglio,Alex Lucia Vinciguerra,Alberto Grotto,Serena Milan,Daniele Tognetto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.01.003

IF: 6.197

2024-02-01

Survey of Ophthalmology

Abstract:In phakic patients Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) or Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) are frequently combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation (triple procedure). This surgery might cause a refractive shift difficult to predict. Early DMEK and DSAEK results have shown a tendency toward a hyperopic shift. Myopic postoperative refraction is typically intended to correct this postoperative refractive defect and to bring all eyes as close to emmetropia as possible. We sought to understand the mechanism underlying the hyperopization and to identify predictive factors for poorer refractive outcomes, the most suitable target refraction and IOL calculation methods in patients undergoing combined cataract extraction and lamellar endothelial corneal transplantation (DSAEK or DMEK) for endothelial dysfunctions. Of the 407 articles analyzed, only 18 were included in the analysis. A myopic target between -0.50 D and -0.75 was the most common (up to -1.50 for DSAEK triple procedures), even though no optimum target was found. Hyperopic surprises appeared more frequently in corneas that were flatter in the center than in the periphery (oblate posterior profile). Among the numerous IOL calculation formulas, there was no apparent preference.

ophthalmology
Complications and Outcomes of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty with Artisan Aphakia Intraocular Lens Implantation.

Rong-Mei Peng,Yu-Xin Guo,Yuan Qiu,Yan-Sheng Hao,Jing Hong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2018.04.11

IF: 1.645

2018-01-01

International Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract:AIM:To evaluate the complications and outcomes of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) combined with artisan aphakia intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in severely damaged eyes without capsular support.METHODS:DSAEK combined with artisan iris claw IOL implantation was performed on 29 eyes. All eyes were of abnormal structure due to complications from prior intraocular surgeries and ocular trauma. Ocular complications observed included graft dislocations, high intraocular pressure (IOP), IOL dislocations, macular edema and hyphema. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), IOP and mean central endothelial cell density (ECD) were recorded.RESULTS:Thirteen eyes had a history of ocular trauma, 10 eyes had an anterior chamber IOL, 16 eyes had prior vitrectomy. The iris was abnormal in 22 cases. Graft dislocation occurred in 5 (17.2%) of 29 eyes. IOL dislocation occurred in 2 eyes (6.9%). High IOP was found in 9 eyes and was controlled with treatment. The preoperative mean BCVA was 20/286. The 6mo postoperative mean BCVA was 20/42. The average center ECD was 1965.3 cells/mm2 at 6mo, and the rate of the donor cell loss was 34.7%.CONCLUSION:DSAEK combined with artisan aphakia IOL implantation is an alternative option for resolving endothelial and lens disorders in aphakic eyes without capsular support. However, it should be performed cautiously for eyes with severe iris defects.

Structural changes ofNoetia ponderosa red blood cell membranes during cell volume regulation in reduced salinities: A freeze fracture study

Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lenses in Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy Patients: Results from Triple Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Procedure

Combined or sequential DMEK in cases of cataract and Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy-A systematic review and meta-analysis

[Outcomes of hemi-Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and phacoemulsification for the treatment of primary Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy combined with cataract]

Effect of Simultaneous Endothelial Keratoplasty and Cataract Surgery: A Secondary Analysis of the Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Endothelial Failure in Primary Angle Closure Suspects

Endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with a retained angle-supported intraocular lens

A measure of moral values.

[The Effect of Descemet-Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined with Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery or Lens Exchange].

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty as Treatment for Late-Onset Interface Fluid Syndrome After Laser In Situ Keratomileusis

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and intraocular lens implantation in cases of aphakic bullous keratopathy

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Aphakic, Aniridic, and Vitrectomized Eyes: A Review

Associations between cartilage oligomeric matrix protein and several articular tissues in early knee joint osteoarthritis.

Double trouble in DMEK surgery: Learning experience and review of the literature

Women and the use of health services.

A UK Tertiary Eye Care Referral Centre Experience

Recombination activating gene 1 (Rag1) in zebrafish and shark

Visual Outcomes Following Non-Diffractive Extended-Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens Implantation in Patients with Epiretinal Membrane in One Eye and Bilateral Cataracts

Simultaneous Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Corneal Endothelial Failure With Stromal Scarring

Hitting the refractive target in corneal endothelial transplantation triple procedures: A systematic review

Complications and Outcomes of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty with Artisan Aphakia Intraocular Lens Implantation.