Abstract:Statistical approaches for evaluating causal effects and for discovering causal networks are discussed in this paper.A causal relation between two variables is different from an association or correlation between them.An association measurement between two variables and may be changed dramatically from positive to negative by omitting a third variable,which is called Yule-Simpson paradox.We shall discuss how to evaluate the causal effect of a treatment or exposure on an outcome to avoid the phenomena of Yule-Simpson paradox. Surrogates and intermediate variables are often used to reduce measurement costs or duration when measurement of endpoint variables is expensive,inconvenient,infeasible or unobservable in practice.There have been many criteria for surrogates.However,it is possible that for a surrogate satisfying these criteria,a treatment has a positive effect on the surrogate,which in turn has a positive effect on the outcome,but the treatment has a negative effect on the outcome,which is called the surrogate paradox.We shall discuss criteria for surrogates to avoid the phenomena of the surrogate paradox. Causal networks which describe the causal relationships among a large number of variables have been applied to many research fields.It is important to discover structures of causal networks from observed data.We propose a recursive approach for discovering a causal network in which a structural learning of a large network is decomposed recursively into learning of small networks.Further to discover causal relationships,we present an active learning approach in terms of external interventions on some variables.When we focus on the causes of an interest outcome, instead of discovering a whole network,we propose a local learning approach to discover these causes that affect the outcome.

Don't Let Your Analysis Go to Seed: On the Impact of Random Seed on Machine Learning-based Causal Inference

Causal Inference and Counterfactual Prediction in Machine Learning for Actionable Healthcare

Estimating individual treatment effect: generalization bounds and algorithms

Achieving Reliable Causal Inference with Data-Mined Variables: A Random Forest Approach to the Measurement Error Problem

Identifying Causal-Effect Inference Failure with Uncertainty-Aware Models

Pseudo-random Number Generator Influences on Average Treatment Effect Estimates Obtained with Machine Learning

Generalization Bounds for Causal Regression: Insights, Guarantees and Sensitivity Analysis

Causal Inference and Related Statistical Methods

Stochastic Intervention for Causal Effect Estimation

The Value Added of Machine Learning to Causal Inference: Evidence from Revisited Studies

Causal Inference under Interference and Model Uncertainty

Can algorithms Replace Expert Knowledge for Causal Inference? A Case Study on Novice Use of Causal Discovery

Automated versus do-it-yourself methods for causal inference: Lessons learned from a data analysis competition

Leveraging Random Assignment to Impute Missing Covariates in Causal Studies

Stochastic Intervention for Causal Inference via Reinforcement Learning

Smoke and Mirrors in Causal Downstream Tasks

Fisher-Schultz Lecture: Generic Machine Learning Inference on Heterogenous Treatment Effects in Randomized Experiments, with an Application to Immunization in India

RCT Rejection Sampling for Causal Estimation Evaluation

Evaluating stochastic seeding strategies in networks

Machine learning in policy evaluation: new tools for causal inference