Abstract:Many algorithms have been recently proposed for causal machine learning. Yet, there is little to no theory on their quality, especially considering finite samples. In this work, we propose a theory based on generalization bounds that provides such guarantees. By introducing a novel change-of-measure inequality, we are able to tightly bound the model loss in terms of the deviation of the treatment propensities over the population, which we show can be empirically limited. Our theory is fully rigorous and holds even in the face of hidden confounding and violations of positivity. We demonstrate our bounds on semi-synthetic and real data, showcasing their remarkable tightness and practical utility.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is the quality assessment of algorithms in causal machine learning (Causal ML), especially in the case of limited samples. Specifically, the paper focuses on how to provide theoretical guarantees to ensure the validity and reliability of extracting causal relationships from data. These problems include: 1. **Quality assessment of causal ML algorithms**: Although many causal ML algorithms have been proposed in recent years, the theoretical support for the quality of these algorithms is still insufficient. In particular, there is a lack of sufficient theoretical analysis for their performance in the case of limited samples. 2. **Model generalization ability**: How to assess the performance of these causal ML algorithms on unseen data, that is, their generalization ability. This involves how to ensure that the model can be effectively generalized to new data when the training data is limited. 3. **Impact of assumption violations**: How do these algorithms perform when causal assumptions (such as ignorability and positivity assumptions) do not hold? For example, when there are unobserved confounding factors, how to assess and improve the performance of the model. To solve the above problems, the paper proposes a theoretical framework based on generalization bounds. By introducing a new measure - transformation inequality (based on Pearson χ² divergence), the paper can tightly bound the model loss, and these bounds can be restricted by the observed data. Specific contributions include: - **Novel generalization bounds**: Generalization bounds applicable to multiple causal regression algorithms. These bounds are universal, assume - lightweight, framework - independent, and are effective even when the ignorability or positivity assumptions do not hold. - **Empirically - limit - able relaxed bounds**: These bounds can be completely limited with high probability by empirical data, thereby achieving practical bounds for unobservable counterfactual losses. - **Measure - transformation inequality based on Pearson χ² divergence**: This inequality is particularly suitable for causal inference problems and is very tight. - **Ability to optimize other loss functions**: Research shows that it is possible to estimate the treatment effect while optimizing other loss functions (such as mean absolute error and quantile loss), which was previously considered impossible. Through these theories and techniques, the paper provides a solid theoretical foundation for causal ML algorithms and demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of these bounds in practical applications.

Generalization Bounds for Causal Regression: Insights, Guarantees and Sensitivity Analysis

Estimating individual treatment effect: generalization bounds and algorithms

Testing Generalizability in Causal Inference

Causal Regularization: On the trade-off between in-sample risk and out-of-sample risk guarantees

Causal Forecasting:Generalization Bounds for Autoregressive Models

Prediction-powered Generalization of Causal Inferences

Generalization bound for estimating causal effects from observational network data

Generalization bounds and algorithms for estimating conditional average treatment effect of dosage

An Automated Approach to Causal Inference in Discrete Settings

Generalization Error Bounds for Learning under Censored Feedback

An Information-Theoretic Approach to Generalization Theory

Enhancing Model Robustness and Fairness with Causality: A Regularization Approach

Scalable Computation of Causal Bounds

Towards Bounding Causal Effects under Markov Equivalence

Promises and Challenges of Causality for Ethical Machine Learning

A Neural Framework for Generalized Causal Sensitivity Analysis

Observational Causality Testing

Ensembled Prediction Intervals for Causal Outcomes Under Hidden Confounding

Generalization Bounds for Estimating Causal Effects of Continuous Treatments

Sharp Bounds on Causal Effects in Case-Control and Cohort Studies

Causal Inference with Latent Variables: Recent Advances and Future Prospectives