Abstract:Introduction: Non-linear Mendelian randomization is an extension of conventional Mendelian randomization that performs separate instrumental variable analyses in strata of the study population with different average levels of the exposure. The approach estimates a localized average causal effect function, representing the average causal effect of the exposure on the outcome at different levels of the exposure. The commonly used residual method for dividing the population into strata works under the assumption that the effect of the genetic instrument on the exposure is linear and constant in the study population. However, this assumption may not hold in practice. Methods: We use the recently developed doubly ranked method to re-analyse various datasets previously analysed using the residual method. In particular, we consider a genetic score for 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) used in a recent non-linear Mendelian randomization analysis to assess the potential effect of vitamin D supplementation on all-cause mortality. Results: The effect of the genetic score on 25(OH)D concentrations varies strongly, with a five-fold difference in the estimated genetic association with the exposure in the lowest and highest decile groups. Evidence for a protective causal effect of vitamin D supplementation on all-cause mortality in low vitamin D individuals is evident for the residual method but not for the doubly ranked method. We show that the constant genetic effect assumption is more reasonable for some exposures and less reasonable for others. If the doubly ranked method indicates that this assumption is violated, then estimates from both the residual and doubly ranked methods can be biased, although bias was smaller on average in the doubly ranked method. Conclusion: Analysts wanting to perform non-linear Mendelian randomization should compare results from both the residual and doubly ranked methods, as well as consider transforming the exposure for the residual method to reduce heterogeneity in the genetic effect on the exposure.

Pseudo-random Number Generator Influences on Average Treatment Effect Estimates Obtained with Machine Learning

Don't Let Your Analysis Go to Seed: On the Impact of Random Seed on Machine Learning-based Causal Inference

An Examination of On-Line Machine Learning Approaches for Pseudo-Random Generated Data

Estimating Distributional Treatment Effects in Randomized Experiments: Machine Learning for Variance Reduction

Randomization inference for treatment effect variation

Estimating individual treatment effect: generalization bounds and algorithms

Quantifying Inherent Randomness in Machine Learning Algorithms

Predicting treatment effects from observational studies using machine learning methods: A simulation study

Estimating treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized program evaluation

Regression-adjusted Average Treatment Effect Estimates in Stratified Randomized Experiments

Estimating Total Treatment Effect in Randomized Experiments with Unknown Network Structure

Selective Machine Learning of the Average Treatment Effect with an Invalid Instrumental Variable

Random-effect Based Test for Multinomial Logistic Regression: Choice of the Reference Level and Its Impact on the Testing

Randomization to Randomization Probability: Estimating Treatment Effects under Actual Conditions of Use.

Machine learning for subgroup discovery under treatment effect

On The Impact of Machine Learning Randomness on Group Fairness

Metalearners for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects using machine learning

Nonrandom Exposure to Exogenous Shocks

Regression-based multiple treatment effect estimation under covariate-adaptive randomization

Interpretation and Potential Biases of Mendelian Randomization Estimates With Time-Varying Exposures.

Violation of the Constant Genetic Effect Assumption Can Result in Biased Estimates for Non-Linear Mendelian Randomization