Abstract:Abstract A new and rapidly growing econometric literature is making advances in the problem of using machine learning methods for causal inference questions. Yet, the empirical economics literature has not started to fully exploit the strengths of these modern methods. We revisit influential empirical studies with causal machine learning methods aiming to connect the econometric theory on these methods with empirical economics. We focus on the double machine learning, causal forest and generic machine learning methods, in the context of both average and heterogeneous treatment effects. We illustrate the implementation of these methods in a variety of settings and highlight the relevance and value added relative to traditional methods used in the original studies.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to use machine - learning methods to provide more value in causal inference. Specifically, the authors re - examined several influential empirical studies and applied causal machine - learning methods to evaluate the advantages of these methods over traditional methods. They focused on Average Treatment Effects (ATE) and Heterogeneous Treatment Effects (HTE), and used Double Machine Learning (DML), Causal Forest and Generic Machine Learning methods. ### Main objectives of the paper: 1. **Demonstrate the advantages of causal machine - learning methods in practical settings**: By re - analyzing existing empirical studies, the authors demonstrated the advantages of causal machine - learning methods in handling complex interactions, high - dimensional data, systematic model selection, and estimating heterogeneous treatment effects. 2. **Compare the performance of causal machine - learning methods with that of traditional methods**: The authors evaluated the performance of causal machine - learning methods relative to traditional methods under different data - generation processes through Monte Carlo simulation experiments. 3. **Provide practical advice**: Based on the results of the re - analysis, the authors provided suggestions and precautions for applied researchers on using causal machine - learning methods. ### Specific problems: - **Average Treatment Effects (ATE)**: The authors re - analyzed two observational studies, namely Djankov et al. (2010a) on the impact of corporate tax on investment and entrepreneurship, and Nunn and Treﬂer (2010a) on the impact of skill - biased tariffs on long - term economic growth. - **Heterogeneous Treatment Effects (HTE)**: The authors selected two studies, one by DellaVigna and Kaplan (2007a) on the impact of Fox News on the Republican vote share, and the other by Loyalka et al. (2019a) on the impact of teacher - training interventions on student performance. ### Main findings: 1. **Handling complex interactions**: Causal machine - learning methods can more flexibly estimate the relationships between outcome variables, treatment variables, and covariates, thereby reducing the bias caused by omitted variables. 2. **Handling high - dimensional data**: When the number of covariates is large relative to the sample size, causal machine - learning methods assume that the model is sparse and use regularized regression, thereby improving the estimation accuracy. 3. **Systematic model selection**: Many machine - learning methods select the best functional form by estimating and comparing multiple model specifications. Model selection is data - driven and fully documented. 4. **Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects**: Causal machine - learning methods can systematically handle multiple covariates that may lead to treatment - effect heterogeneity, thereby reducing the risk of omitting important heterogeneous effects. Through these analyses, the authors demonstrated the potential advantages of causal machine - learning methods in empirical research, especially in handling complex data and improving estimation accuracy.

The Value Added of Machine Learning to Causal Inference: Evidence from Revisited Studies

Machine learning in policy evaluation: new tools for causal inference

Recent Developments in Causal Inference and Machine Learning

Causal Machine Learning and its use for public policy

Causal Inference Meets Machine Learning

Estimating Causal Effects with Double Machine Learning -- A Method Evaluation

Making the most of AI and machine learning in organizations and strategy research: Supervised machine learning, causal inference, and matching models

Machine Learning and Causal Analyses for Modeling Financial and Economic Data

Promises and Challenges of Causality for Ethical Machine Learning

Causal Inference and Counterfactual Prediction in Machine Learning for Actionable Healthcare

Causal Machine Learning: A Survey and Open Problems

Double Machine Learning for Adaptive Causal Representation in High-Dimensional Data

Machine Learning Methods Economists Should Know About

Retrospective Causal Inference with Machine Learning Ensembles: An Application to Anti-recidivism Policies in Colombia

Evaluation Methods and Measures for Causal Learning Algorithms

Learning Causal Effects From Observational Data in Healthcare: A Review and Summary

Causal inference with Machine Learning-Based Covariate Representation

Correction To: Machine Learning in Causal Inference: Application in Pharmacovigilance

Heterogeneous causal effects with imperfect compliance: a Bayesian machine learning approach

Machine Unlearning for Causal Inference

A survey of deep causal models and their industrial applications