Abstract:Summary Learning about cause and effect is arguably the main goal in applied econometrics. In practice, the validity of these causal inferences is contingent on a number of critical assumptions regarding the type of data that has been collected, and the substantive knowledge that is available about the phenomenon under investigation. For instance, unobserved confounding factors threaten the internal validity of estimates; data availability is often limited to nonrandom, selection-biased samples; causal effects need to be learned from surrogate experiments with imperfect compliance; and causal knowledge has to be extrapolated across structurally heterogeneous populations. A powerful and flexible causal inference framework is required in order to tackle all of these challenges, which plague essentially any data analysis to varying degrees. Building on the structural perspective on causality introduced by Haavelmo (1943) and the graph-theoretic approach proposed by Pearl (1995), the artificial intelligence (AI) literature has developed a wide array of techniques for causal inference that allow us to leverage information from various imperfect, heterogeneous, and biased data sources (Bareinboim and Pearl, 2016). In this paper, we review recent advances made in this literature that have the potential to contribute to econometric methodology along three broad dimensions. First, they provide a unified and comprehensive framework for causal learning, in which the above-mentioned problems can be addressed in generality. Second, due to their origin in AI, they come together with sound, efficient, and complete (to be formally defined) algorithmic criteria for automation of the corresponding identification task. And third, because of the nonparametric description of structural models that graph-theoretic approaches build on, they combine the analytical rigor of structural econometrics with the flexibility of the potential outcomes framework, and thus offer a valuable complement to these two literature streams.

Causal Machine Learning and its use for public policy

Machine learning in policy evaluation: new tools for causal inference

The Value Added of Machine Learning to Causal Inference: Evidence from Revisited Studies

Causal Inference Tools for a Better Evaluation of Machine Learning

Recent Developments in Causal Inference and Machine Learning

Causal Machine Learning: A Survey and Open Problems

Promises and Challenges of Causality for Ethical Machine Learning

Machine Learning Methods Economists Should Know About

Active labour market policies for the long-term unemployed: New evidence from causal machine learning

On the Need and Applicability of Causality for Fair Machine Learning

Causal Inference and Counterfactual Prediction in Machine Learning for Actionable Healthcare

Making the most of AI and machine learning in organizations and strategy research: Supervised machine learning, causal inference, and matching models

Estimating Causal Effects with Double Machine Learning -- A Method Evaluation

A causal machine-learning framework for studying policy impact on air pollution: A case-study in COVID-19 lockdowns

Transparency challenges in policy evaluation with causal machine learning -- improving usability and accountability

Causal inference and data fusion in econometrics

Machine Learning: An Applied Econometric Approach

Fairness Implications of Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation with Machine Learning Methods in Policy-making

Using Machine Learning to Test Causal Hypotheses in Conjoint Analysis

Causal machine learning for predicting treatment outcomes