Microstructural evolution of Mg-Al-Re alloy reinforced with alumina fibers

Li Li,Dejiang Li,Xiaoqin Zeng,Alan A. Luo,Bin Hu,Anil K. Sachdev,Liangliang Gu,Wenjiang Ding
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2019.07.012
IF: 11.813
2020-09-01
Journal of Magnesium and Alloys
Abstract:Few studies were reported on the phases' relationships of AE44 (Mg-4.0Al-4.1RE-0.3Mn, wt.%) and its composites. In this work, AE44 alloy and Saffil (δ-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>)/AE44 Metal matrix composite (MMC) were both prepared by slow shot high pressure die casting (SS-HPDC) technology and their phase constitutions were all studied in detail using experimental techniques combined with CALPHAD (Calculation of Phase Diagram) modeling. The results revealed that the alloy consists of the α-Mg matrix, Al<sub>11</sub>RE<sub>3</sub> intermetallic phase, and one trace phase Al<sub>3</sub>RE, while the composite contains five major phases: α-Mg, δ-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, Al<sub>3</sub>RE, MgO and Mg<sub>2</sub>Si, and two trace phases of Al<sub>2</sub>RE and Al<sub>11</sub>RE<sub>3</sub>, respectively. Al<sub>11</sub>RE<sub>3</sub> is partly derived from Al<sub>2</sub>RE, while Al<sub>3</sub>RE is a product of the peritectoid reaction between the two precipitates. The presence of MgO and Mg<sub>2</sub>Si is due to the interfacial reaction between the SiO<sub>2</sub> binder in the fiber preforms and the molten magnesium during infiltration. The use of SiO<sub>2</sub> binder in the preform manufacturing was limited/minimized to reduce the MgO formation in the MMC casting process, which can be detrimental to the fatigue performance of the MMC materials.
metallurgy & metallurgical engineering
What problem does this paper attempt to address?