Abstract:Background: Small-field dosimetry is challenging for radiotherapy dosimetry because of the loss of lateral charged equilibrium, partial occlusion of the primary photon source by the collimating devices, perturbation effects caused by the detector materials and their design, and the detector size relative to the radiation field size, which leads to a volume averaging effect. Therefore, a suitable tool for small-field dosimetry requires high spatial resolution, tissue equivalence, angular independence, and energy and dose rate independence to achieve sufficient accuracy. Recently, with the increasing use of combinations of coplanar and non-coplanar beams for small-field dosimetry, there is a need to clarify angular dependence for dosimetry where the detector is oriented at various angles to the incident beam. However, the effect of angular dependence on small-field dosimetry with coplanar and non-coplanar beams has not been fully clarified. Purpose: This study clarified the effect of angular dependence on small-field dosimetry with coplanar and non-coplanar beams using various detectors. Methods: Seven different detectors were used: CC01, RAZOR, RAZOR Nano, Pinpoint 3D, stereotactic field diode (SFD), microSilicon, and microDiamond. All measurements were taken using a TrueBeam STx with 6 MV and 10 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) energies using a water-equivalent spherical phantom with a source-to-axis distance of 100 cm. The detector was inserted in a perpendicular orientation, and the gantry was rotated at 15° increments from the incidence beam angle. A multi-leaf collimator (MLC) with four field sizes of 0.5 × 0.5, 1 × 1, 2 × 2, and 3 × 3 cm2 , and four couch angles from 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° (coplanar and non-coplanar) were adopted. The angular dependence response (AR) was defined as the ratio of the detector response at a given irradiation gantry angle normalized to the detector response at 0°. The maximum AR differences were calculated between the maximum and minimum AR values for each detector, field size, energy, and couch angle. Results: The maximum AR difference for the coplanar beam was within 3.3% for all conditions, excluding the maximum AR differences in 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 field for CC01 and RAZOR. The maximum AR difference for non-coplanar beams was within 2.5% for fields larger than 1 × 1 cm2 , excluding the maximum AR differences for RAZOR Nano, SFD, and microSilicon. The Pinpoint 3D demonstrated stable AR tendencies compared to other detectors. The maximum difference was within 2.0%, except for the 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 field and couch angle at 90°. The tendencies of AR values for each detector were similar when using different energies. Conclusion: This study clarified the inherent angular dependence of seven detectors that were suitable for small-field dosimetry. The Pinpoint 3D chamber had the smallest angular dependence of all detectors for the coplanar and non-coplanar beams. The findings of this study can contribute to the calculation of the AR correction factor, and it may be possible to adapt detectors with a large angular dependence on coplanar and non-coplanar beams. However, note that the gantry sag and detector-specific uncertainties increase as the field size decreases.

Dose calculations for asymmetric fields defined by independent collimators using symmetric field data

A Publicly Available Dataset of Out-of-Field Dose Profiles of a 6 MV Linear Accelerator

SU-GG-T-347: Methods to Calculate Organ Doses Due to Scattered Radiation From External Beam Radiation Treatment Using Various Patient Phantoms and Monte Carlo Simulations

Detector-specific correction factors in radiosurgery beams and their impact on dose distribution calculations

A multi-detector comparison to determine convergence of measured relative output factors for small field dosimetry

Comparative assessment and QA measurement array validation of Monte Carlo and Collapsed Cone dose algorithms for small fields and clinical treatment plans

Dose delivery uncertainties assessment in the field junction region of craniospinal irradiation with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy using a robustness index and experimental dose verification

Out of field scatter from electron applicator in modern linear accelerators

SU-FF-T-316: Modifications to the “three-Source Model” for the Calculation of Head Scatter Factors for Small Field Sizes

Pencil beam kernel-based dose calculations on CT data for a mixed neutron-gamma fission field applying tissue correction factors

TU‐C‐110‐01: Patient Dose in CT: Calculating Patient Specific Doses in CT(Joint with Education)

Defining field output factors in small fields based on dose area product measurements: A feasibility study

Design and characterisation of a minibeam collimator utilising Monte Carlo simulation and a clinical linear accelerator

Pre-treatment radiotherapy dose verification using Monte Carlo doselet modulation in a spherical phantom

Impact of Measurement Conditions and Design Features of IBA Detectors on the Small Radiation Fields Output Factors

INVESTIGATION OF SECONDARY MIXED RADIATION FIELD AROUND A MEDICAL LINEAR ACCELERATOR

Clinical applicability of Linac-integrated CBCT based NIPAM 3D dosimetry: a dual-institutional investigation

Small field output factor measurement and verification for CyberKnife robotic radiotherapy and radiosurgery system using 3D polymer gel, ionization chamber, diode, diamond and scintillator detectors, Gafchromic film and Monte Carlo simulation

Effect of angular dependence for small-field dosimetry using seven different detectors

Assessment of four dose calculation algorithms using IAEA-TECDOC-1583 with medium dependency correction factor (K med ) application

A Clinical Monte Carlo Dosimetric Evaluation in Accelerated Partial Breast Electronic Brachytherapy