Abstract:Objective To compare the spine-pelvic sagittal parameters of the healthy and young Han males in standing, erect sitting and natural sitting. Evaluate the effect of pelvic rotation on sagittal balance. Methods This was a cross-sectional study. Thirty-two volunteers were recruited from the graduate students of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from September 2017 to October 2017. All the volunteers were males, aged between 23 to 27 (24.8 ± 1.6) years old, 171 -185 (176.4 ± 5.3) cm in height, 57.7 -88.4 (69.5 ± 8.6) kg in weight, and BMI 21.2-24.7 (22.5 ± 2.3) kg/m2. EOS-X-ray imaging system was applied to all subjects, and vertical scanning method was adopted. Full-length images were scanned once, and standing position, erect sitting and natural sitting position were taken. Parameters were measured included thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA). Paired-samples T test was used to compare the changes of parameters in different positions, and Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the relationship between spinopelvic parameters. Results For 32 volunteers, in standing position, the average PI was 49.06°± 6.22°, PT was 13.38°± 6.06°, SS was 35.03°± 2.32°, LL was -47.16°± 7.64°, TK was 32.22°± 9.74°, SVA was (3.29 ± 13.64)mm, TPA was 9.47°± 5.26°. In erect sitting position, the average PI was 48.22°± 6.07°, PT was 29.06° ± 10.35°, SS was 18.84° ± 5.90°, LL was -26.38° ± 8.45°, TK was 31.78° ± 9.95°, SVA was (34.73 ± 13.62) mm, TPA was 26.06° ± 8.71°. In natural sitting position, the average PI was 49.22°± 6.20°, PT was 40.50°± 10.42°, SS was 9.84°± 4.87°, LL was -4.03° ± 6.14°, TK was 31.69° ± 9.73°, SVA was (63.37 ± 13.70) mm, TPA was 49.66° ± 11.22°. Compared with the parameters of standing position, PT, SVA and TPA parameters of erect and natural sitting position increased, SS and LL parameters decreased. Compared with the parameters of erect sitting position: PT, SVA and TPA parameters of natural sitting position increased, SS and LL parameters decreased. The differences were statistically significant( all P values<0.05). Pearson correlation analysis results showed that: ( 1 ) In standing position, PI was correlated with PT, LL, TK and TPA. PT was correlated with LL, TK and TPA. LL was correlated with TK and TPA. TK was correlated with TPA.(2) In erect sitting position, PI was correlated with PT, SS, LL, TK and TPA. PT was correlated with SS, LL, TK and TPA. SS was correlated with LL, TK and TPA. LL was correlated with TK and TPA. TK was correlated with TPA.(3) In natural sitting position, PI was correlated with PT, SS, LL, TK and TPA. PT was correlated with SS, LL, TK and TPA. SS was correlated with LL, TK and TPA. LL was correlated with TK and TPA. Differences were statistically significant ( all P values<0.05). Conclusions In the process of from the standing position to the upright sitting position, the upright sitting position to the natural sitting position, Han people the LL of normal Han young men is decreasing and SVA, TPA are increasing. It indicates that SVA moves anteriorly and the pelvic rotates posteriorly. Some correlation between spinal parameters and pelvic parameters are also shown. The changing of pelvis can influence the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine.

Can pelvic incidence affect changes in sagittal spino-pelvic parameters between standing and sitting positions in individuals with lumbar degenerative disease?

The factors influencing the adjustment function of PI on spinal sagittal balance in normal subject

A clinical study of the coronal plane deformity in Parkinson disease

Analysis of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment in Chinese young subjects in standing versus sitting positions

Variations of Sagittal Alignment in Standing Versus Sitting Positions Under the Roussouly Classification in Asymptomatic Subjects

Position-related Change of Pelvic Incidence Depends on the Nonfused Sacroiliac Joint in Patients with Degenerative Spinal Diseases

Compensatory Mechanism of Maintaining the Sagittal Balance in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis Patients with Different Pelvic Incidence

Sagittal lumbar and pelvic alignment in the standing and sitting positions

The Standing and Sitting Spino‐Pelvic Sagittal Alignment in Patients with Instrumented Lumbar Fusion Might Correlate with Adjacent Segment Degeneration

The Imaging Study on the Changes of Sagittal Parameters of Different Positional Spine-Pelvis in Young Han Men

Sagittal Plane Analysis of the Spine and Pelvis in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

Radiological Analysis of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis in Relation to Pelvic Incidence.

Impact of Pelvic Anteversion on Spinopelvic Alignment in an Asymptomatic Population: a Dynamic Perspective of Standing and Sitting

The Pelvic Incidence Stratified Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment in Asymptomatic Chinese Population with Different Age Groups

Pelvic index: A new pelvic parameter for assessing sagittal spinal alignment

Comparison of Sagittal Spinal Alignment on Standing Plain X-Rays and Supine MRI in Degenerative Lumbar Disease.

Preoperative supine pelvic incidence predicts standing pelvic incidence following S2AI fixation in patients with adult spinal deformity: a prospective study

Correlations between the sagittal plane parameters of the spine and pelvis and lumbar disc degeneration

Correlation Between Sagittal Spinal and Pelvic Parameters in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

Correlation of Lower Lumbar Disc Degeneration and Spino-pelvic Sagittal Balance Parameters

Analysis of Spino-pelvic Sagittal Alignment in Young Chinese Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation