Abstract:BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Axial-loaded magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can partially simulate the lumbar spine in patients in a standing position and potentially provides additional imaging findings that cannot be obtained with conventional MRI in the clinical assessment of patients with degenerative lumbar disease. Previous studies have shown that axial-loaded MRI demonstrates a significant reduction in the size of the dural sac compared with conventional MRI. However, there has been no study to compare the degree of olisthesis among conventional MRI, axial-loaded MRI, and upright X-ray imaging in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS).PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to determine whether axial-loaded MRI can demonstrate similar positional changes in lumbar olisthesis as those detected on upright lateral X-ray in patients with DS.STUDY DESIGN: This is an imaging cohort study.PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 43 consecutive patients with DS exhibiting olisthesis of 3 mm or more on X-ray images in the standing position were prospectively evaluated in this study.OUTCOME MEASURES: The degree of olisthesis, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and percentage of patients exhibiting olisthesis of 3 mm or more on MRI.METHODS: The degree of olisthesis was measured on conventional MRI, axial-loaded MRI, and lateral X-ray imaging performed in the upright position. The degree of olisthesis was compared among the three imaging techniques. The ICC values for the measurements of olisthesis between X-ray studies and conventional and axial-loaded MRI were calculated and compared. The percentage of patients exhibiting olisthesis of 3 mm or more was compared between conventional MRI and axial-loaded MRI.RESULTS: The degree of olisthesis on axial-loaded MRI (5.962.5 mm) was significantly greater than that observed on conventional MRI (4.4 +/- 2.4 mm) (p<.05) although the degrees on conventional and axial-loaded MRI were significantly smaller than that on upright X-ray images (7.1 +/- 2.8 mm) (p<.05). The ICC between axial-loaded MRI and X-ray imaging (0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.58-0.85) was considerably greater than that observed between conventional MRI and X-ray imaging (0.40, 95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.62). The percentage of patients exhibiting olisthesis of 3 mm or more was significantly higher on axial-loaded MRI (91%) than on conventional MRI (63%) (p<.01).CONCLUSIONS: Axial-loaded MRI demonstrates a significantly larger degree of olisthesis than conventional MRI. In addition, the degree of olisthesis on axial-loaded MRI was found to be more strongly correlated with that observed on X-ray studies in the upright position. Furthermore, the use of axial-loaded MRI significantly reduced the misdiagnosis of olisthesis of 3 mm or more that was detected on X-ray imaging. These results suggest that axial-loaded MRI may be superior to identify the olisthesis of the lumbar spine and show the degrees of olisthesis correlated to those detected on upright X-ray imaging. Further studies should be needed to clarify the actual value of these findings on axial-loaded MRI and provide the evidence to support its clinical significance in the assessment of patients with DS. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Comparison of Sagittal Spinal Alignment on Standing Plain X-Rays and Supine MRI in Degenerative Lumbar Disease.

Correlation and Differences in Lumbopelvic Sagittal Alignment Parameters Between Lumbar Radiographs and Magnetic Resonance Images

MRI May Serve As a Valid Alternative to Standing Radiography in Evaluating the Sagittal Alignment of the Upper Thoracic Spine

Comparison Between Supine MRI and Standing X-ray in the Measurement of Cobb Angle, Thoracic ;kyphosis and Lumbar Lordosis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

An Analysis of Radiographic Parameters Comparison Between Lumbar Spine Latericumbent and Full-Length Lateral Standing Radiographs

Measurement of Thoracic Inlet Alignment on MRI: Reliability and the Influence of Body Position.

Changes in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis on Axial-Loaded MRI: Do They Reproduce the Positional Changes in the Degree of Olisthesis Observed on X-ray Images in the Standing Position?

Effect of patient position on the lordosis and scoliosis of patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

Predictability of degenerative disc disease by lumbar sagittal alignment on conventional radiograph in comparison with cross-sectional magnetic resonance imaging

MRI to Measure Cervical Sagittal Parameters: a Comparison with Plain Radiographs.

Correlation between the sagittal spinopelvic alignment and degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study

Association Between Radiographic Spinopelvic Parameters and Health-related Quality of Life in De Novo Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Concomitant Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

The Characteristics of Spinopelvic Sagittal Alignment in Patients with Lumbar Disc Degenerative Diseases

Radiological analysis for thoracolumbar disc herniation in spinopelvic sagittal alignment: A retrospective study.

Correlation Between Sagittal Spinal and Pelvic Parameters in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

[Radiological Analysis of Coronal and Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters in Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Kyphoscoliosis].

The compensatory mechanisms for global sagittal balance in degenerative spinal kyphosis patients: a radiological analysis of muscle-skeletal associations

Analysis of Radiographic Spinopelvic Parameters in Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Kyphoscoliosis

An analysis of spinopelvic sagittal alignment after lumbar lordosis reconstruction for degenerative spinal diseases: how much balance can be obtained?

Diagnostic Efficacy of Orthostatic X⁃ray Radiography in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Does Kyphotic Configuration on Upright Lateral Radiograph Correlate with Instability in Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis?