On combining statistical noise levels
Renzo Tonin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2024.109912
IF: 3.614
2024-02-17
Applied Acoustics
Abstract:An analytical and experimental study was conducted to determine the underlying accuracy of combining statistical noise levels, particularly the LAF90,T and the LAF10,T . Combining values of LAF90,T is important in the wind energy industry particularly where the contribution from wind turbines is to be determined from the total measured noise level. It is stated in wind farm standards that logarithmic addition and subtraction of LAF90,T sound pressure levels is "not strictly mathematically correct" . The objective of this study is to explore the accuracy of the results and what might influence the accuracy. The methodology and results for an analytical and experimental study are reported. The analytical study involves the combination of gaussian distributions of sound pressure levels because this represents a simple case to model mathematically using the Monte Carlo method in the absence of a closed form solution. The Monte Carlo method is a simulation of a random process whereby random numbers of the simulated variables are generated and combined according to underlying physical formulas. The experimental study uses audio data recorded in real situations. The sources of noise include six wind turbine types and, so as to broaden the study to involve other noise sources, a resource recovery industrial site, patron noise in a beer garden and wedding setting, and a construction site. Noise recordings from these sources are combined with recordings from eleven ambient receiver situations including rural, suburban and urban area types. Values of D90 (being the difference between the logarithmic sum and actual value) in respect of the LAF90,T , and D10 in respect of the LAF10,T , are reported with the result that D90 is found to be negative in the range 0 to −3 dB (for the cases in this study), meaning that the logarithmic sum of LAF90,T for the ambient and source sound pressure level distributions is less than the actual value of LAF90,T for the combined distribution. The difference D90 increases (i.e. becomes more negative) with increasing fluctuation strength of either distribution (where the fluctuation strength is defined as LAF10,T - LAF90,T ). The difference D10 is positive in the range 0 to 1 dB (for the cases in this study) meaning that the logarithmic sum of LAF10,T for the two sound pressure level distributions is greater than the actual value of LAF10,T for the combined distribution. The consequence of the observation that D90 is negative depends upon the application. For example, if one is interested in estimating the total LAF90,T by summing the individual contributions of ambient and source then the actual value of LAF90,T for the combined distribution will be greater than that derived by logarithmic summation of the individual components. On the other hand, if one is interested in determining the source contribution in the total sound pressure level, then the actual value of LAF90,T for the source will be less than that derived by logarithmic subtraction of the individual components. For all intents and purposes, the values of D10 in respect of the LAF10,T are below 1 dB and therefore there may be no need to correct for that quantity in real situations.
acoustics