Abstract:Quantum cryptographic protocols are typically analysed by assuming that potential opponents can carry out all physical operations, an assumption which grants capabilities far in excess of present technology. Adjusting this assumption to reflect more realistic capabilities is an attractive prospect, but one that can only be justified with a rigorous, quantitative framework that relates adversarial restrictions to the protocols security and performance. We investigate the effect of limitations on the eavesdropper's (Eve's) ability to make a coherent attack on the security of continuous-variable quantum key distribution (CV-QKD). We consider a realistic attack, in which the total decoherence induced during the attack is modelled by a Gaussian channel. Based on our decoherence model we propose an optimal hybrid attack, which allows Eve to perform a combination of both coherent and individual attacks simultaneously. We evaluate the asymptotic and composable finite-size security of a heterodyne CV-QKD protocol against such hybrid attacks in terms of Eve's decoherence. We show that when the decoherence is greater than a threshold value, Eve's most effective strategy is reduced to the individual attack. Thus, if we are willing to assume that the decoherence caused by the memory and the collective measurement is large enough, it is sufficient to analyse the security of the protocol only against individual attacks, which significantly improves the CV-QKD performance in terms of both the key rate and the maximum secure transmission distance.

On the optimality of individual entangling-probe attacks against BB84 quantum key distribution

Double blinding-attack on entanglement-based quantum key distribution protocols

A quantum cloning bound and application to quantum key distribution

Tight Security Bounds for Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution

Reconciliation for Practical Quantum Key Distribution with BB84 protocol

Secure BB84-type Quantum Key Distribution with a Simple Phase Error Formula.

A Study Of Bb84 Protocol In A Device-Independent Scenario: From The View Of Entanglement Distillation

Quantum key distribution with imperfectly isolated devices

Asymptotically Optimal prepare-measure Quantum Key Distribution Protocol

Burning the Trojan Horse: Defending against Side-Channel Attacks in QKD

Optimum Probe Parameters for Entangling Probe in Quantum Key Distribution

Phase error rate estimation in QKD with imperfect detectors

Security of the decoy-state BB84 protocol with imperfect state preparation

Optimal realistic attacks in continuous-variable quantum key distribution

RETRACTED: Secure BB84-type Quantum Key Distribution with a Simple Phase Error Formula (retracted Article. See Vol. 45, Pg. 3385, 2020)

Necessary detection efficiencies for secure quantum key distribution and bound randomness

Decoherence-assisted quantum key distribution

High Dimensional Quantum Eavesdropping: A Hypothetical Attack on BB84 & SSP

Simplified BB84 quantum key distribution secure against coherent attacks

On the role of coherent attacks in a type of strategic problem related to quantum key distribution

Numerical Security Proof for Decoy-State BB84 and Measurement-Device-Independent QKD Resistant against Large Basis Misalignment