Abstract:The use of decoy states in quantum key distribution (QKD) has provided a method for substantially increasing the secret key rate and distance that can be covered by QKD protocols with practical signals. The security analysis of these schemes, however, leaves open the possibility that the development of better proof techniques or better classical postprocessing methods might further improve their performance in realistic scenarios. In this paper, we derive upper bounds on the secure key rate for decoy-state QKD. These bounds are based basically only on the classical correlations established by the legitimate users during the quantum communication phase of the protocol. The only assumption about the possible postprocessing methods is that double click events are randomly assigned to single click events. Further, we consider only secure key rates based on the uncalibrated device scenario which assigns imperfections such as detection inefficiency to the eavesdropper. Our analysis relies on two preconditions for secure two-way and one-way QKD. The legitimate users need to prove that there exists no separable state (in the case of two-way QKD) or that there exists no quantum state having a symmetric extension (one-way QKD) that is compatible with the available measurements results. Both criteria have been previously applied to evaluate single-photon implementations of QKD. Here we use them to investigate a realistic source of weak coherent pulses. The resulting upper bounds can be formulated as a convex optimization problem known as a semidefinite program which can be efficiently solved. For the standard four-state QKD protocol, they are quite close to known lower bounds, thus showing that there are clear limits to the further improvement of classical postprocessing techniques in decoy-state QKD.

Optimum Probe Parameters for Entangling Probe in Quantum Key Distribution

Asymptotically Optimal prepare-measure Quantum Key Distribution Protocol

Protocol choice and parameter optimization in decoy-state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution

Quantum Key Distribution: Security, Feasibility and Robustness

Practical Issues in Quantum-Key-distribution Postprocessing

Practical Round-Robin Differential-Phase-shift Quantum Key Distribution

Tight Security Bounds for Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution

Optimizing Decoy‐State Protocols for Practical Quantum Key Distribution Systems

Security of the decoy-state BB84 protocol with imperfect state preparation

Upper bounds for the secure key rate of the decoy-state quantum key distribution

Improve the Efficiency of A Practical Quantum Key Distribution System

Optimizing Decoy State Enabled Quantum Key Distribution Systems to Maximize Quantum Throughput and Detect Photon Number Splitting Attacks with High Confidence

Generalized decoding, effective channels, and simplified security proofs in quantum key distribution

Quantum Key Distribution with Two-Qubit Quantum Codes.

N ov 2 00 4 A decoy-state protocol for quantum cryptography with 4 intensities of coherent light

Four-state Quantum Key Distribution Exploiting Maximum Mutual Information Measurement Strategy

Fair Efficiency Comparisons of Decoy-state Quantum Key Distribution Protocols

Experimental 4-Intensity Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution With Asymmetric Basis-Detector Efficiency

Practical Non-Orthogonal Decoy State Quantum Key Distribution with Heralded Single Photon Source

A quantum cloning bound and application to quantum key distribution

Imperfect Phase-Randomisation and Generalised Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution