Abstract:The use of decoy states in quantum key distribution (QKD) has provided a method for substantially increasing the secret key rate and distance that can be covered by QKD protocols with practical signals. The security analysis of these schemes, however, leaves open the possibility that the development of better proof techniques or better classical postprocessing methods might further improve their performance in realistic scenarios. In this paper, we derive upper bounds on the secure key rate for decoy-state QKD. These bounds are based basically only on the classical correlations established by the legitimate users during the quantum communication phase of the protocol. The only assumption about the possible postprocessing methods is that double click events are randomly assigned to single click events. Further, we consider only secure key rates based on the uncalibrated device scenario which assigns imperfections such as detection inefficiency to the eavesdropper. Our analysis relies on two preconditions for secure two-way and one-way QKD. The legitimate users need to prove that there exists no separable state (in the case of two-way QKD) or that there exists no quantum state having a symmetric extension (one-way QKD) that is compatible with the available measurements results. Both criteria have been previously applied to evaluate single-photon implementations of QKD. Here we use them to investigate a realistic source of weak coherent pulses. The resulting upper bounds can be formulated as a convex optimization problem known as a semidefinite program which can be efficiently solved. For the standard four-state QKD protocol, they are quite close to known lower bounds, thus showing that there are clear limits to the further improvement of classical postprocessing techniques in decoy-state QKD.

Tight Security Bounds for Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution

Improved Key-Rate Bounds for Practical Decoy-State Quantum-Key-distribution Systems

Four-intensity Decoy-state Quantum Key Distribution with Enhanced Resistance against Statistical Fluctuation

Enhanced Analysis for the Decoy-State Method

Upper bounds for the secure key rate of the decoy-state quantum key distribution

Simplified BB84 quantum key distribution secure against coherent attacks

Concise security bounds for practical decoy-state quantum key distribution

Decoy-State Method of Quantum Key Distribution with Both Source Errors and Statistics Fluctuations

Secure BB84-type Quantum Key Distribution with a Simple Phase Error Formula.

Universally-composable finite-key analysis for efficient four-intensity decoy-state quantum key distribution

Finite-key Analysis of Practical Decoy-State Measurement-Device-independent Quantum Key Distribution with Unstable Sources

Security of Biased Bb84 Quantum Key Distribution with Finite Resource

Quantum Key Distribution with the Decoy-State Method

Fair Efficiency Comparisons of Decoy-state Quantum Key Distribution Protocols

Security of the decoy-state BB84 protocol with imperfect state preparation

A Study Of Bb84 Protocol In A Device-Independent Scenario: From The View Of Entanglement Distillation

A Bayesian based finite-size effect analysis of QKD

Experimental Quantum Key Distribution with Decoy States

Secret key rate bounds for quantum key distribution with non-uniform phase randomization

Experimental Quantum Key Distribution with Source Flaws and Tight Finite-Key Analysis

Intensity correlations in decoy-state BB84 quantum key distribution systems