Abstract:The use of decoy states in quantum key distribution (QKD) has provided a method for substantially increasing the secret key rate and distance that can be covered by QKD protocols with practical signals. The security analysis of these schemes, however, leaves open the possibility that the development of better proof techniques or better classical postprocessing methods might further improve their performance in realistic scenarios. In this paper, we derive upper bounds on the secure key rate for decoy-state QKD. These bounds are based basically only on the classical correlations established by the legitimate users during the quantum communication phase of the protocol. The only assumption about the possible postprocessing methods is that double click events are randomly assigned to single click events. Further, we consider only secure key rates based on the uncalibrated device scenario which assigns imperfections such as detection inefficiency to the eavesdropper. Our analysis relies on two preconditions for secure two-way and one-way QKD. The legitimate users need to prove that there exists no separable state (in the case of two-way QKD) or that there exists no quantum state having a symmetric extension (one-way QKD) that is compatible with the available measurements results. Both criteria have been previously applied to evaluate single-photon implementations of QKD. Here we use them to investigate a realistic source of weak coherent pulses. The resulting upper bounds can be formulated as a convex optimization problem known as a semidefinite program which can be efficiently solved. For the standard four-state QKD protocol, they are quite close to known lower bounds, thus showing that there are clear limits to the further improvement of classical postprocessing techniques in decoy-state QKD.

Fair Efficiency Comparisons of Decoy-state Quantum Key Distribution Protocols

Tight Security Bounds for Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution

Improved Key-Rate Bounds for Practical Decoy-State Quantum-Key-distribution Systems

Optimizing Decoy‐State Protocols for Practical Quantum Key Distribution Systems

Universally-composable finite-key analysis for efficient four-intensity decoy-state quantum key distribution

Reexamination Of Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution With Biased Bases

Decoy-state quantum key distribution with biased basis choice

Finite-key Analysis of Practical Decoy-State Measurement-Device-independent Quantum Key Distribution with Unstable Sources

Four-intensity Decoy-state Quantum Key Distribution with Enhanced Resistance against Statistical Fluctuation

An Improved Scheme on Decoy-State Method for Measurement-Device-independent Quantum Key Distribution

Protocol choice and parameter optimization in decoy-state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution

Security of Biased Bb84 Quantum Key Distribution with Finite Resource

Decoy State Quantum Key Distribution with Finite Resources

Upper bounds for the secure key rate of the decoy-state quantum key distribution

Improve the Efficiency of A Practical Quantum Key Distribution System

Experimental 4-Intensity Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution With Asymmetric Basis-Detector Efficiency

Quantum Key Distribution with the Decoy-State Method

Quantum Key Distribution: Security, Feasibility and Robustness

Reexamination Of The Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution With An Unstable Source

Security analysis of the decoy method with the Bennett-Brassard 1984 protocol for finite key lengths

Practical Non-Orthogonal Decoy State Quantum Key Distribution with Heralded Single Photon Source