Effect of polymerization methods in the cytotoxicity of two resins used in removable prosthodontics – an in vitro study
Diogo Arruda,Susana Bandarra,Joana Carvalho,Ana Clara Ribeiro,Paulo Mascarenhas,Evguenia Bekman,Sérgio Félix,Isabel Barahona
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2018.1561990
IF: 5.348
2019-03-29
Annals of Medicine
Abstract:<span><b>Introduction:</b> Polymethylmethacrylate resins are essential materials in the Oral Rehabilitation field. However, their use is being called into question once they can cause adverse reactions in the adjacent tissues [<span><a href="#">1</a><span> <span>Goiato <span>MC</span></span>, <span>Freitas <span>E</span></span>, <span>Dos Santos <span>D</span></span>, et al. <span>Acrylic resin cytotoxicity for denture base – Literature review.</span> Adv Clin Exp Med. <span>2015</span>;24:<span>679</span>–<span>686</span>. doi:<span>10.17219/acem/33009</span><span><span><a href="/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0451&dbid=16&doi=10.1080%2F07853890.2018.1561990&key=10.17219%2Facem%2F33009">[Crossref]</a>, <a href="/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0451&dbid=8&doi=10.1080%2F07853890.2018.1561990&key=26469114">[PubMed]</a>, <a href="/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0451&dbid=128&doi=10.1080%2F07853890.2018.1561990&key=000360287300017">[Web of Science ®]</a></span> <span>, <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?hl=en&publication_year=2015&pages=679-686&author=MC+Goiato&author=E+Freitas&author=D+Dos+Santos&title=Acrylic+resin+cytotoxicity+for+denture+base+%E2%80%93+Literature+review.">[Google Scholar]</a></span></span></span></span>]. Previous work has shown that ProBase® Cold releases a higher amount of monomers MMA and HEMA when compared to the heat-polymerized ProBase® Hot [<span><a href="#">2</a><span> <span>Pina <span>C</span></span>. Caracterização por HPLC dos monómeros de duas resinas utilizadas em Prótese Removível: ProBase® Hot e ProBase® Cold (Master Thesis). Instituto Superior de Ciências da Saúde Egas Moniz. <span>2017</span>.<span> <span><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=Pina+C.+Caracteriza%C3%A7%C3%A3o+por+HPLC+dos+mon%C3%B3meros+de+duas+resinas+utilizadas+em+Pr%C3%B3tese+Remov%C3%ADvel%3A+ProBase%C2%AE+Hot+e+ProBase%C2%AE+Cold+%28Master+Thesis%29.+Instituto+Superior+de+Ci%C3%AAncias+da+Sa%C3%BAde+Egas+Moniz.+2017.">[Google Scholar]</a></span></span></span></span>]. Having that in consideration, it is important to know if polymerization methods have influence in cytotoxicity of these materials. In this <i>in vitro</i> study, our aim is to evaluate the cytotoxicity level of ProBase® Hot and ProBase® Cold in fibroblastic cell line through cell viability assay and our hypothesis is that ProBase® Cold is more cytotoxic than ProBase® Hot.<b>Materials and methods:</b> Specimens of each resin were prepared according to manufacturer's instructions for clinical use. Then, 4 disks (5mm in diameter x 2mm in height) were immersed in 7mL of culture medium and incubated for 4 different times (30 minutes, 24 hours, 7 days and 14 days). Serial dilutions of the previously incubated resin extracts were placed in contact with 4×10<sup>3</sup> of 3T3 mouse fibroblasts that have been plated in a 96 well plate the day before. After 24 hours of exposition, cell viability was evaluated through the Crystal Violet assay. Absorvance was measured at 595nm in a microplate reader (Biorad 680). The results were evaluated by Student's t-test (SPSS, Chicago, IL) and the level of significance was chosen as p-value <0.05.<b>Results:</b> Undiluted extracts of both resins produce significant differences in mouse fibroblasts viability when they were incubated for 14 days (<a href="#F0001">Figure 1</a>). Even though, with all dilutions and incubation times of the extracts tested, cell viability was never below 70%, which is the threshold stated in ISO 10993-5:2009 to be considered cytotoxic [<span><a href="#">3</a><span> ISO 10993-5 Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2009.<span> <span><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=ISO+10993-5+Biological+evaluation+of+medical+devices+%E2%80%93+Part+5%3A+Tests+for+in+vitro+cytotoxicity.+Geneva%2C+Switzerland%3A+International+Organization+for+Standardization%3B+2009.">[Google Scholar]</a></span></span></span></span>].<span>Figure 1. </span> Cell viability of 3T3 fibroblasts when exposed to ProBase® resins. The values are present as mean ± SD in relation to non-exposed cells (defined as 100% cell viability). *p Figure 1. Cell viability of 3T3 fibroblasts when exposed to ProBase® resins. The values are present as mean ± SD in relation to non-exposed cells (defined as 100% cell viability). *p Discussion and conclusions: Our results show that ProBase® Hot and ProBase® Cold are not cytotoxic in our cell model. In this case, our hypothesis was not verified. The polymerization method of both resins does not influence their cytotoxicity.</span>
medicine, general & internal